Part of the problem is that a shared rewards pool is kind of like communism and not to say it is but I am trying to say it is a tricky thing with people fighting over perceived "LIMITED" resources in the rewards pools which leads people down the path of upvoting and downvoting in an attempt to Robin-Hood everything to redistribute value and money and wealth and everything like Obama would have us do and that is like I said the tricky thing about all of this. The argument for the need for downvoting is understandable, like I understand their side, and I also am against it at the same time. So, my compromise approach is to add trials and jurors and voters to piggybag your ideas.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
THE "REWARD POOL" IS REVERSE COMMUNISM.
THE "REWARD POOL" STEALS FROM THE POOR AND GIVES TO THE RICH.
EVERY STAKE-HOLDER IS ENTITLED TO SELF-VOTE.
THERE IS NO MORAL THEORY WHERE SELF-VOTING IS A "CRIME".