"Art. 2: The 5 members will not impose any rules, they will be a kind of council that will discuss issues of concern of the community, look for a solution and then present the community as an official statement from the community."
I believe this section needs to be fleshed out further. Will the 5 have the ability to implement rules if the community agrees with the rule or change? How will the 5 know the majority of the community agrees with the solution they have come up with? will there be votes? How will the 5 deal with dissent among themselves in the event of a 3-2 split for changes to governance or over a solution to a community issue.
There are other pieces to discuss here as well...
We are talking about the creation of a powerful council that will help to guide the direction of POB. There needs to be very clear language about what can and cannot be done with that power and how they will ensure they actually have the communities consent and agreement on issues and changes.
The idea would be the consensus, thinking about solutions until they reach one that the five agree on
ok so it would be full consensus or nothing. and how would those decisions be ratified by the community once theyve been settled on by the 5?
Yeah the consensus is critical. Especially if it could involve decision making on certain matters. It's more like a fail safe.