Hmm, the end of my comment went missing...odd.
I know what you mean about the literature. It's not easy to work through. That's why I think simplified comparisons might be a better way to go. The percentage chances the different types of reactions to the vaccines and the diseases, for example.
Interestingly, those who have vaccine injured or lost a child to vaccine have often done more research on them and the history than the rest of us, so you don't want to go up against them without being fully versed.
Yeah, it's really curious but I guess it has to do with the fact that something happened with the vaccine, I mean, if nothing happens at all that issue will not draw your attention, but if it do, is normal to look into it to know what is going on.
I always say everyone should be versed on things we do every day or happens to anyone, of course, well-researched studies and literature is what I recommend, I wouldn't point someone directly to some conman, I hate when those guys win and trick innocent people
They're not conmen. They certainly don't lie in order to trick people and what they've researched is correct, maybe just one sided. Their motives aren't sinister, they just don't want anyone else to go through what they've been through and they'd be just as horrified if they convinced someone not to vaccinate and they lost their child to the disease.
I believe sometimes we can read too much into someone's motives, yet when it boils down to it they are really much simpler than we think.
Oh no, I guess I expressed myself incorrectly there, I don't mean by conmen those who advocate for antivaccination and have gone through bad experiences, but those who use the fear of those with horrible experiences to sell them snake oils and that kind of stuff, I mean, they are already beaten down by their situation, selling them healing crystals is not a solution and it's wrong in so many levels
Oh, can't say I've encountered that. Maybe that's why I assumed you meant the other.