I don't agree, but I respect your idea in metaphysical matters.
But to say that Schrödinger's idea is wrong, as you said "a false premise", is to completely deny the understanding of matter itself we acquired by mean of Schrödinger's (and other people) ideas. I am talking on a materialistic level, of course.
For what concerns your idea about what time is, what role emotions play in the "sensible world", it could be interesting to talk, but, it not need quantum mechanics or the critics to all the research done 'till now.
A old good metaphysics is always welcome, but it is what it is: speculation. Unless you prove it. Because even for metaphysics, it may be defined (in an epistemological way) a proof. And that's an other story.
exactly. I no longer agree with modern materialistic science.
I have seen too many disproofs of all the big formulas
such as:
Further, i have experienced many thing in the ways of metaphysics. Such as changing the past.
And, what really sucks is that NONE of these can be proven.
I change my past, and all you remember is the new past.
You will say, "nothing changed, where's your proof?"
However i have met many people who have had similar experiences.