That’s the essence of it. If this becomes viral, your increased time investment will start being rewarded financially in a deserving way. It’s a cycle of giving and receiving—it always works like that and no other way. To achieve balance, there needs to be many such initiatives, similar in principle but with differences. You encourage comments, someone else focuses on posts, another on Snaps, and so on. The goal isn’t to create another almighty curator but to have hundreds of curators with significant, but not overwhelming, voting power.

This way, the final value would be shaped not by 5 votes out of 100, but by 95 votes out of 200.

When I mentioned greed, I wasn’t referring to you personally but to the curator as an institution.😁