I'm not so sure that auto-voting comments (or even posts) is a good idea. It seems kinda fake to me, as the voter is not reading the post or comment yet is still voting on it. I understand that by auto-voting the trust is being put in another curators opinion, who actually does read the post or comment. I don't know. In real reality (unity) there is no right or wrong, it's only in this dream world of opposites, this duality or play of life. So i suppose everything is alright really :-)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
No te creas, tampoco soy de mucho apoyar los trails, sin embargo cuando un curador se gana la fama de votar calidad y contenido que aporte valor a la comunidad, entonces, un trail es beneficioso y hasta necesario.
En nuestro proyecto tenemos criterios definidos y puede confiar en nosotros para valorar comentarios de valor.
Le sigo para estar atento a su compromiso en Hive.
Gracias por comentar.
Don't believe me, I'm not a big supporter of trails either, however when a curator earns a reputation for voting quality and content that brings value to the community, then a trail is beneficial and even necessary.
In our project we have defined criteria and you can trust us to value comments of value.
I follow you to be attentive to your engagement on Hive.
Thanks for commenting.
And having said that, i get quite a few autovotes, for which i am highly appreciative. And i am very careful when i post to remember votes will come, so to be sure of at least some reasonable level of value/quality of the posts. For very short posts (on D.Buzz in particular) i limit the post payout (albeit usually by more than 1 HBD).
Sorry, I just realized that I wrote the comment in Spanish. I already edited it in English.
No worries, i can read some Spanish and can use DeepL if needed, but thanks for the translation anyway, it does make it easier. I'm finding this proposal to be quite interesting, i will look deeper and revert.
Namaste
Gracias por su consideración. Seguimos interactuando.