it is only one direction to go, bro.
compact cameras have their benefits too.
depends on a lot of moments. your decision should be based on money, camera price label, your style of photography, the results you want to get, etc etc etc. choose what is more appropriate for you, what suits you.
on my comment above, about the full-frame: this can be a huge help for your maturing as a photographer, for making a step forward and improving photographer skills. at least it worked for me that way, allowed me to start shooting manually, with manual vintage lens... etc. sadly, it all takes money investments into lens. getting more cheap and dated compact-camera - instead of a DSLR - MAY BE - a better, more beneficial way and still a step forward from smartphone photography. all the best, my best wishes to you, really. and I hope 0,5 price label will turn into 5,0 label... in a few years.
yeah, thanks a lot for your advice this is my friend, i will see and which one is more suitable for me,because it all depends on my pocket money,I hope I can get the best.
"era was ended" -- it depends on the point of view you take.
I admit you selection criteria migh be different. for example, I bought my full-frame camera for less than 300 dollars; now check how much a good compact camera costs today ... oh-oh-oh, seven members team hold me tight - it is 3-4k USD! plus a good lens for it at half that amount... then, consider for yourself what is more profitable to buy today: a fashionable compact camera of "this era" or a good proven camera with optics from the pre-previous era, for the reasonable money. or a good smartphone, haha....
Oh! I didn't know full frame is cheaper now. In this case you definitely right. Better to buy some old 5dmkii, than fancy compact camera. Smartphone is actually a good idea too!
I went with 1st version of 5d - which has no video options, pretty sadly - but at the time 5dmkii would cost me by 2 times more. now ofc it is much more available, even 5dmkiii has an acceptable price label... -- I'd resume in that way - the camera doesnt matter much, you can operate with a wide range of tools, but good lens arsenal is what matter, lens do nate date in the way that cameras do, right?.. but the most recent cameras editions have a crazy price label, partly because camera manufacturers produce and sell fewer cameras each year -> the market has shrunk, being squeezed by smartphones and compact cameras! - and because of this, fewer cameras -> each one is charged a bigger price. thats the logic behind it, as I see it. in the future, cameras will be sold at the price of "luxury products" ehehe...
Yeah, that's cool.
I will also try to buy a canon camera.
a piece of advice - dont buy a crop camera, buy a full-frame! thats the way for the real samurai xD
yeah, i will try to buy like your suggestion.
it is only one direction to go, bro.
compact cameras have their benefits too.
depends on a lot of moments. your decision should be based on money, camera price label, your style of photography, the results you want to get, etc etc etc. choose what is more appropriate for you, what suits you.
on my comment above, about the full-frame: this can be a huge help for your maturing as a photographer, for making a step forward and improving photographer skills. at least it worked for me that way, allowed me to start shooting manually, with manual vintage lens... etc. sadly, it all takes money investments into lens. getting more cheap and dated compact-camera - instead of a DSLR - MAY BE - a better, more beneficial way and still a step forward from smartphone photography. all the best, my best wishes to you, really. and I hope 0,5 price label will turn into 5,0 label... in a few years.
yeah, thanks a lot for your advice this is my friend, i will see and which one is more suitable for me,because it all depends on my pocket money,I hope I can get the best.
I thought full-frame era was ended a long time ago. I like small cameras more. Like fuji x100 or ricoh gr.
ricoh gr is a super option, could not but agree.
"era was ended" -- it depends on the point of view you take.
I admit you selection criteria migh be different. for example, I bought my full-frame camera for less than 300 dollars; now check how much a good compact camera costs today ... oh-oh-oh, seven members team hold me tight - it is 3-4k USD! plus a good lens for it at half that amount... then, consider for yourself what is more profitable to buy today: a fashionable compact camera of "this era" or a good proven camera with optics from the pre-previous era, for the reasonable money. or a good smartphone, haha....
Oh! I didn't know full frame is cheaper now. In this case you definitely right. Better to buy some old 5dmkii, than fancy compact camera. Smartphone is actually a good idea too!
I went with 1st version of 5d - which has no video options, pretty sadly - but at the time 5dmkii would cost me by 2 times more. now ofc it is much more available, even 5dmkiii has an acceptable price label... -- I'd resume in that way - the camera doesnt matter much, you can operate with a wide range of tools, but good lens arsenal is what matter, lens do nate date in the way that cameras do, right?.. but the most recent cameras editions have a crazy price label, partly because camera manufacturers produce and sell fewer cameras each year -> the market has shrunk, being squeezed by smartphones and compact cameras! - and because of this, fewer cameras -> each one is charged a bigger price. thats the logic behind it, as I see it. in the future, cameras will be sold at the price of "luxury products" ehehe...