For the last (almost) thirty four years I've shot large-calibre centrefire firearms; rifles and handguns. I've not had any purpose of use for the smaller rimfire calibres such as the .17 HMR and .22 LR and so haven't been all that interested in them. Recently that attitude has begun to shift.
Unfortunately gunpowder and primers for handguns is in short (pretty much no) supply and that's problematic.
I shoot run and gun matches with semi-automatic centrefire handguns, 38 Super and 9mm mostly and in each match I might shoot some 200-300 rounds. I do this most weekends which adds up to a lot of rounds which need replacing. I make my own ammunition and gunpowder and primers are required of course, and they're almost impossible to get and when available are so costly it actually makes more financial sense to buy pre-made factory rounds.
With this in mind, a lot of shooters are moving to the .22LR calibre providing the ability to shoot a lot for very low cost. It's not as fun, but it's an alternative. They're not selling up their other calibres though, just adding on the .22LR which is what I'm looking at doing.
𝕋𝕒𝕦𝕣𝕦𝕤 𝕋𝕏𝟚𝟚 ℂ𝕠𝕞𝕡𝕖𝕥𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟
There's a few on the list to evaluate and research but I really like the one I'm holding in the picture above, the Taurus TX22 Competition.
It comes optic-ready meaning the factory fit an optics baseplate so all one needs to do is buy the optic, red-dot sight, and screw it on. The awesome thing is that the optic doesn't sit on the slide itself, which cycles backwards and forwards when the firearm is fired, it sits on the top of the barrel section, so the optic remains stationary as the gun cycles through.
There's other good features like the threaded barrel for compensator or suppressor, adjustable rear sight (useless if using optics) and the magazine release is reversible for left or right handed shooters. There's also a nice thumb-rest groove on both sides which helps the shooter get the right grip really nicely. The magazines are cheap, I'd need six, it has a nice four-pound trigger and is a full-sized handgun, not scaled down, and it's a nice looking firearm too.
It's not cheap, the firearm, additional magazines and the optics would cost just under $2,000AUD but...well, I like it and if it stacks up I'd spring for it.
You can see it here in the configuration I'd want, with the C-More RTS red-dot sight mounted which costs almost as much as the handgun itself. I'd prefer a Trijicon red-dot sight but they're more costly and more suited to a centrefire handgun - sort of overkill for .22LR use.
I had some trigger time with this firearm the other day and it was pretty nice. It sent the lead downrange quickly, meaning as fast as I could pull the trigger (which is fast) and reasonably accurately, certainly accurately enough for what I'd need, and I had no feed issues in over a hundred rounds - That aspect is critical. The grip felt nice in the hand, although it could use some more grip texture but I think this isn't too much of an issue for the .22LR as the recoil is so much less than larger calibres. Anyway, that's nothing that a soldering iron couldn't fix...I'd just stipple the grip to add more texture and grip. Other than that, it's a pretty solid shooter.
There's a lot of considerations when it comes to choosing a firearm, first of which it's purpose of use and suitability to the job, but also how it shoots, feels in the hand, how easy the take-down is as one may need to do so in the field, how readily accessories are, the cost of additional magazines, the overall operation, repeatability and reliability, cost and value, and other stuff besides. I'm lucky that I'll get to use some of the firearms I'm considering to evaluate them, but some I won't which is where the research becomes very important. I really like this Taurus, not the most costly, or the cheapest, and just nice to shoot.
Note: If you're wondering what else is on the list, (you're probably not), I have the Colt .22 LR Gold Cup, Sig Sauer P322, Walther WMP, Smith & Wesson SW-22 Victory and the Ruger Mark IV 22/45 on there. (Yep, that's a lot of evaluation to do, but I enjoy it.)
I know most of you folks aren't into firearms and simply don't care about all that blah blah blah text I just wrote...but have you ever had to evaluate and research a product to justify its purchase? Maybe A coffee machine, vehicle, mobile phone, computer, backpack, camping equipment, camera, drone, boots, basically anything we buy can be researched...Have you done so, and if you have, feel free to share in the comments below if you're keen.
Design and create your ideal life, don't live it by default; tomorrow isn't promised so be humble and kind - galenkp
[All original and proudly AI free.]
I took the image in this post.
Well of course, I was wondering what else was on your eval list. I went through a similar process a couple years ago. I've had the privilege of having shot all of these, and more at least a few times. Curious that I don't see a couple on your list. The fairly new Glock .22 (not really on my short list, but solid weapon). And more surprised to not see a Browning Buckmark which is highly regarded.
As you said, there's always a lot of individual preference and intended use involved. Any of the ones you've mentioned above are fine weapons. For me, I chose the Ruger Mark IV 22/45 (tactical model). I wanted the picatinny rail on top AND bottom. Top considerations for me were the rails, ease of takedown/cleaning, ease and availability of custom trigger, accurate barrel or ease of replacement, sights, and custom grip options. The Ruger allows for easy, near drop in replacement of trigger and related springs with custom Volquartsen replacements and (threaded) barrels. The magazines have a nice little pull-down button to make mag loading easier. And then I just fell in love with the Tactical model look once I ran across it (both before and after mods).. It has become my favorite shooter, even more now with the suppressor. I have zero negatives about my choice on that one and still smile every time I pick it up.
Enjoy your search and look forward to seeing the final decision!
Ahh, and here is the pic of the original, before customization...
Well and after the grips and VQ trigger mod... And yes, she is a tack driver!
If I got one it would be the tactical model.
I left the Browning Buckmark and Ruger Mark IV off the list as I'm very familiar with both due their popularity (and would certainly own either). I'll narrow it down and the final choice will be evaluated against those two. The Glock...not really a Glock guy to be honest, personal choice.
I was hoping you'd see this and comment about your Mark IV as it's a legit firearm and one I'd be happy to own.
I'm trying to be practical about it, objective too, hence the testing, but I'd have yours in a shit? $50AUD close to the mark? 🤣
I'm in no hurry and when it happens will do a post about it.
Yes mate, 3 at that price lol. It actually wasn't too bad, I got it just before some of the major price jumps over here a few years ago. Still LOVING it. One of my sons got the "Lite" version, not for me, but it's a solid shooter. My other son has a Walther PPKs, and it was surprisingly good for it's short barrel, but didn't care for the trigger on it at all and expensive to customize.
Lol, you can't blame me for trying.
One of my issues here is the ridiculous amount of forms the government make us complete for importation of gun parts. Triggers and so on - it's the same form for that actual firearm itself! Bonkers. That's why I'm trying to get something I don't feel the need to accessorise too much. It's probably not possible, but I'll try.
Think on my offer mate, and look...I could throw in a jar of Vegemite if it will sway you, a medium sized one.
Ahh, holy cow that is restrictive on the parts! The stock trigger on the Ruger is quite tolerable (even nice by some standards) it broke crisply at just a hair over 3lbs. Probably the nicest out of the bunch. If you wanted to go crazy, look at the VQ "Mamba" versions that would come with all the goodies standard and avoid the later pain, but they start getting a bit pricey.
I don't think they'll take Vegemite in trade. LMAO.
I guess they want to know what's comijg in, thanks to the criminals, they rest the honest people like criminals.
I heard about the Mamba...I'll take a look. Cool name huh?
I have a little .22LR Ruger I inherited from my grandfather-in-law. Really smooth little plinker. Taught my oldest to shoot with it. .22s are fun in their own way. I remember struggling to find reasonably priced ammo during the Obama years for it, often paying 4x if I could even find a box. But glad .22s are gaining in popularity, especially with guys like yourself, who are out there every weekend.
I have a Colt Pony pocket lite .380 I like as my conceal carry, and it is also a very smooth little fella. I had pics of the .22 ready to post but didn’t see a way to add to this reply.
I’m not very well-versed in Ecency yet but trying to engage more frequently. Have a great weekend!
The .22LR is simply not something I've really ever needed and when I have there's always one laying about the place I can borrow from a mate. That's not to say there's not good value in it, and as a trained long range shooter, I'd say to someone starting out, start with a .22LR.
You say the word smooth, in respect of your Colt Pony and I like that...A lot of people go for the wrong elements when choosing firearms and forget the fact they are there to do a job, like a car key, hammer or frying pan...Having a firearm that doesn't suit the shooter is a sure way to ensure it'll be ineffective if needed. Smooth, is a nice way to describe your firearm and I'd say that makes you better at shooting it.
On the image...I use Peakd as my front end and below is how you add an image to a comment.
It's pretty much the same with Ecency.
Thanks for the technical assistance! Maybe it was due to being on mobile. I am back on PC and was able to email myself the pics and find the link you highlighted without issue now.
And yeah, smooth is so important for me regarding firearms. I've had some awesome looking ones that I thought were just gorgeous, but when I took them out to the desert, they kicked like no other, so would trade them at local gun shows until I found ones that worked better for me. That is how I got my Colt. Traded a S&W .45 for it. I have a Springfield .40 that is pretty sweet too. That is my main carry whenever we go anywhere. Each member of my current arsenal has sentimental value.
I actually need to get out more. Have been slacking on both ranges- shooting and golf lol
That looks like a well-used shooter but based on your comment below I think you'd best get to the range and send some lead.
Well then, golf you can keep, I'm monumentally bad at it and have banned myself from ever playing again, but the range...one to two times a week, and I do some culling with my long guns in addition so there's plenty of trigger time.
I’m terrible at golf as well but my best bud loves it so I’ll tag along and play best ball, drink some brews, have some good convos. I’m more of a lifter in my spare time. And working on guitar now too cuz it’s hot here. Just hit 117+ Fahrenheit last week
I'm happy to walk around the course with a mate and offer (really bad) advice and commentary like, oh man, you buggered that one up royally, and my old favourite, geez man, you couldn't have done worse if you tried. I'm not sure if my comments are all that useful, but in lieu of any real advice it's all I've got. Swinging the clubs though...nah, those days are over...there's often too much collateral damage.
Carving up the axe huh? I play some music too, so I know the value.
lol your comments sound about right!
My daughter won a guitar in May. I played as a young kid, but it's been 30+ years. I started practicing chords and songs daily. I am enjoying the challenge. Bob Marley, Pink Floyd, Sublime, and Oasis is where I have been focusing on
I’ve been slowly shopping around for the last year for another handgun, I think I mentioned it before that the 9 I have will tickle a bear and the places we’ve been hiking have been a little more serious and getting exposure to a small extent to bear country. I need a .45 but the trouble is convincing my wife to let me spend the money on it hahaha. Telling her that the hiking we do has the potential to bring us in vicinity to bears won’t go over well as it is, never mind telling her I need another gun to carry with us in case something goes awry lol.
The .22LR though seems like a nice option for inexpensive shooting and especially if in your situation, where the parts are getting difficult to acquire. I’ll have to look into one of those, because it’s always good to get something cheap and fun to shoot as a way to keep up the repetition of it.
What’s the reasoning this time of the asinine logic of the challenge in getting munitions supplies?
The .22LR won't do much more than bounce off a bear I guess, but if you're looking for something fun it's a good way to go due to low buy-in and cost of ammunition. the .45 would be better for the bears for sure, but you'll have to get clearance from the minister of finance.
There's a lot of reasons, none of which are clear. Lack of production is one, they still cite Covid-19 manufacturing issues, import issues (compounds and chemicals) and overseas conflicts also. It's a bit of a dogs breakfast really, meaning a shambles. I have a fuck load of ammunition, and some stock of powder and primers so I should be ok, but I don't like my stock depleting past a certain point, you know...for when China turn up.
My buddy has a mark II and a mark III. I've always wanted one of those. There is just something quite classic about it. I dig the Tarus you have here though. That's a really nice piece. A long long time ago my wife was moonlighting at a party store/sporting goods store. The guy there had a .380 that felt so nice in my hand, but I knew that shooting it would be expensive due to shells in that caliber being hard to find. If I bought something now, it would probably be a .38 revolver with a longer barrel. None of that snub nose stuff for me. Reliable and relatively cheap to shoot, but still has some kick to it.
The Mark II and III are classics; nice feel, easy to shoot and reliable. The pragmatist in me says the Ruger Mark IV is the way to go...but I like a more military-style firearm so I'm doing the research and will see what happens. This Taurus is looking like a good option.
I understand what you mean about the .380, I'd make that same decision everything I own (I have plenty) needs to be readily available, (ammunition (or components).
I've been thinking about a revolver over the last two years and the .38 would be my choice also, good knockdown yet still comfortable to shoot.
You know what they say... Wheel guns are real guns! My friend is on a shooting league and he mentioned that a lot of the other people on the league use Mark IIIs for their matches. I wish I had written down what model that .380 was. While not practical, like I said, it just felt really good.
Lol, indeed I've heard revolver-guys say that about a million times. I get it too, but have been a semi-auto guy when it comes to handguns. I'll get one though, eventually, but the .22LR has to come first.
Mark III's are probably the most used for that purpose (matches). There's a good reason for it.
When you do these types of activities, do you do them timed? Or do you only evaluate the accuracy of the shots? I have not used this pistol here I work with a glock 17, with a pietro beretta fs92, and with a sig sauer I like them all but I feel more preference for the latter, the characteristics of the tauros call my attention, it does not have a hammer, it is a needle like the glock? excellent detail of the scope accessory that remains static and does not affect the recoil of the shots at all, it must be fascinating to have the experience of shooting a few rounds with it ☺️
As you know, in the field, time is always critical so all the shooting I do it timed so that pressure is applied. However, when evaluating a firearm generally not. It's put through its paces though, meaning rapid fired and used in the ways the firearm will be used in the field, or in competition.
I never liked the Glock 17, or any Glocks really, although am familiar with the Beretta you mention and multiple Sig handguns which I like a lot. Bloody expensive though. The Taurus operates the same as the Glock as you say, it's a good system and I like the Taurus TX22 a lot.
I can't always operate firearms I want to buy prior to buying them however when I can I make sure to do so as it can mean I avoid purchasing the wrong thing. This is important with the .22LR as I don't really have a lot of experience with such a small calibre firearm. As mentioned int he post, I like the larger calibres as I've had a use-case for them.
Well, you have to look for alternatives so as not to lose practice, here in Venezuela loading ammunition is not applied, an ammunition is around 01 USD, which is extremely expensive, I have a question, each round of shooting you do is with the Full load?
I do, yes. Although, I tend to load them a little lighter for when I'm shooting in an important competition. There's minimum muzzle velocities though, to prevent people light-loading to help manage the recoil better. I prefer to shoot with full loads as it means I'm practicing to manage the recoil at its worst.
Here, I make my 9mm ammunition for about 0.24 cents AUD. (0.16 USD) and 38 Super is a little more. To buy factory 9mm ammunition it's about 0.46 - 0.50 AUD.
Here it is complicated in the sense of the restrictions by the law for the disarmament control of arms and ammunition, to be able to make an ammunition yourself you should have a permit granted by the Daex, "direction of arms and explosives" governing body, but It is almost impossible for them to grant you such a permit, so there is no way the only ammunition that is available would be the factory ones, which are "Cavim" an anonymous Venezuelan company of military industry which belongs to the state, and the price for each ammunition is of 01$ USD , carry out that activity here for at least 200 rounds with a full magazine in each round and assuming that you carry a pietro bererra fs92 with 15 shots, it would be around 3000$ USD, SUPER EXPENSIVE 🙄 I love shooting but this is one of the factors that limit me in certain aspects
I'm not surprised that they limit (virtually prevent) the making of ammunition there considering the trouble you're having. Here it's not at all regulated, all one needs is a firearms licence to but the gun powder, primers, projectiles and brass. I make rifle and handgun ammunition over various calibres.
I hear what you're saying about the cost, it's a shame though.
I know good shooters who practiced sport shooting, unfortunately this situation led them to move away from this sport, a shame
I put some research into higher dollar purchases and typically look to pick the brain of experts when I can.
Although I am a creature of habit, so when I make a purchase I tend to stick with what is comfortable and what I know. As an example, although a shit gun by standards of most, the gun at my bedside is the Berretta 9mm. Why? Because it is one of the weapons I used for years in the Marines. I know it as well as my own cock and can shoot it with fair accuracy with no regular practice just like it too.😀
Asking people who know can be a good way to do it. I do the same mostly, then evaluate for myself and determine what I want. I'm always careful to make my decision based on me an my purpose of use.
Once a Marine, always a Marine bro...and there's nothing wrong with a Beretta...The M9 is the one you mean right? If you shoot it well, know it like the back of your hand, then that's the way to go. I'd go for reliability and familiarity over whiz-bang features any day.
Yep, M9. Honestly, I have never had challenges with any I had ever been used int he service or the one I have now.
I used a Beretta 92F a lot and liked it. These days I lean in other directions but I made the 92F work well and I'd not have wanted to stand down range in front of me shooting it. Lol.
I used to think it's just "aim and shoot" with guns. Never thought bullets feel different to shooters. The recoils are different, since the builds are different.
I have held and shot a lot of guns in my life. And, I'll say, red dot sight is my favourite. I'm not familiar with many optics—just holographic and tactical scope—but red dot is clean and better to me. But, yeah, there's only little one can know in video games. Heh...
I'm curious to how the stippling would work. Is the grip of the Taurus made of rubber or plastic? I'm not sure why I think it's made of metal, so the soldering iron thung got me wondering.
I do a lot of research and evaluation when it comes to gadgets. Earphones, phones, and PC, mostly. I like to have great value for my money. For example, it was a go big or go home situation with my current phone.
I didn't have that much to afford the actual specs I'd love to explore, so I had to find the right phone that I'd enjoy. I considered every detail necessary to determine if it was right. I figured it was just right, as there aren't that many budget phones that offer what it does at the price, as old as it is. It's now scarce, but I dug deep to find it. I am proud of my decision and evaluating everyday.
That's typical, and expected. You don't know what you don't know...and there's good reason for that - You're not an experienced gun guy.
The Taurus TX22 grip (frame) is polymer, so one can use a soldering iron to melt little dots (stippling) into it which gives the grip more texture and grip.
Your process of research is always going to help you get the right tool for the job, or know when no to purchase something. It's a better process than impulse-buying which often brings buyers remorse.
Definitely! But I quite enjoy learning about them. Now, I know a little more about guns, line rimfire vs centerfire calibres.
Yeah, impulse buying is basically picking stuff blindfolded. Mostly brings regrets, unless one's lucky.
Sunday greetings!
I research almost everything I buy. I'm mulling over a gun purchase myself at the moment. When I was a kid we used to shoot .22 rifles for fun. I've never had many handguns so I can't speak a lot on them.
Currently, I'm eyeing an AR-15 for an extremely low price.
Doing some research lessens the chance of getting it wrong and with firearms that's usually costly.
I never did the .22LR rifle thing when I learned, I went straight to centrefire with handguns and rifles and the rest is history as they say. Hopefully that AR works out for you, nice shooters and if it's cheap, even nicer.
The current PSA $100 lower+$230 upper with BCG (go mid-length) deal is a pretty good deal for a basic no-rail AR. If that's what you're looking at, I'd send it. Otherwise the Andro one with M-LOK rail that Primary Arms throws up for $400 every couple months or so seems like a budget winner.
I saw an Anderson for around $350. What's your opinion on them? I have buddies that buy the lowers all of the time for low cost builds. Never saw anyone with the complete gun.
I haven't used an Anderson but I probably wouldn't get one fully assembled by them. Their reputation is too low.
Andro is apparently at least a step above. Although some reviews for the one PA sells for $400 every few months say that certain parts started rusting so I'd give it a once over with some gun oil right after I got it.
PSA's reputation isn't spotless but they in theory warranty everything they sell. I don't have any PSA stuff myself and I don't know how easy it is to get warranty service with them though.
The best values for a bulletproof AR-15 right now are probably the IWI Zion-15, if you can deal with its heavy barrel and handguard, or a BCM MK2 BFH Enhanced Lightweight Upper with free BCM bolt carrier group and the lower of your choosing. Both are going to be a lot more than ~$400 though.
I debating all of it. One thing I'm thinking too (at least to my knowledge) is if I get a full lower, I'll have to register it. I really would prefer not doing that. I could always buy something peer-to-peer. We'll see.
80% and a jig?
I think that's the ticket. Thanks for all of the advice homie.
One thing is certain, I love guns and if it is true many would tell me... how is that? But I do and I have no idea why.
The other thing that is true is that I don't know about calibers or anything like that, but I am attracted to them. Maybe that taste comes from some ancestor besides my grandfather, I think a great-grandfather was a military man.
Regarding the evaluation and research of a purchase, I have done it many times, especially in computers. In the case of this one that I have now, the idea was only that it was basic, office, I never thought about designing again or HIVE, so later, if for example I want to do 3d design I will have to evaluate the purchase of a new one with the right features, brands, and all its contents, in addition to the price.
Another thing that was in evaluation recently is a photographic camera, for the moment, to begin with, something basic, then I will improve it.
Many times I ask for consultation to my brother, he is a technician in computer and telephony, he knows much more and an advice is not too much.
Those are the two things that cost the most and that I have had to evaluate, the rest is simpler.
Note: I was looking a lot at the picture, I love it!
Hugs Galen, good Sunday!
It's interesting that people are attracted to firearms, people who don't have or use them, and I come across that quite a lot. Maybe a fascination with something that seems taboo or dangerous or something? For me, they're just a tool; yeah I like them, but just a tool all the same.
Cameras and computers need a lot of thought. I bought both in 2020 and took a little time to (hopefully) get it right. I think I did well with a well/highly-specified Microsoft Surface Laptop and my Olympus camera. Both have served me well for three years now. I'm sure you'll make a good choice when it comes time for it.
Thanks for your comment, I know it can be difficult for non-gun people to comment on things like this.
I have no knowledge of the technical side of the weapons but I like to see them, it is attractive, because of the danger... maybe, it is interesting. Maybe in another life I was a policeman, I always imagine that.
In the case of the computer, this one I have is going well, I improved the ram memory recently, it's an Asus notebook, I can't improve it much more. But later I want a computer, a desktop, better prepared, a lot to analyze.
In the case of the camera, it will require me to study how to use it, I never had one, it is great. Canon brand. Let's see how it turns out, it excites me and makes me happy with these tools.
Thank you!
I believe it's good to have some understanding of them, one never knows when that information will come in handy.
Exactly, some detailed information is always required.
Great Monday!😀
The Trijicon SRO is a great competitive optic, but yeah, they cost an absurd amount. There are cheaper SRO-like optics that apparently are fine on 9mm pistols so should be ok on a .22. I'm not sure how availability is in Australia but here's what we can get here:
https://www.vectoroptics.com/products/index/sn/Frenzy-Red-Dot.html
The 1x20x28, 1x22x26, and 1x22x32 models specifically. I haven't used these optics but Viridian, a legit company in my neck of the woods, seems confident enough in them to sell the green versions under their brand name.
I rate Trijicon highly from every perspective...but the price is a little crazy. Those you shared look pretty good, I've not used one but a guy at the range has one and seems to like it.
We can get most things here, there's some paperwork involved, but it's pretty straightforward really. These wouldn't be a problem. I'll look into it, Tha ks for the heads up and the link.
Wow!! I also love guns, bro.
It is a toy for a big boy.
It is a very nice feeling especially when we are at the firing range and hitting the target with a perfect score.
How I wish I could have played in a competition.
I'd not go as far as saying I love them, they're just a tool really, however I understand what you mean, they are enjoyable to shoot and firearms have been a large part of my life.
You say you go to the range...what firearms do you have?
I don't have one now, but when I was still living with my older sister who is a policewoman, and his husband who is a military, we used to go to the firing range during weekends at their time of availability. I used to handle the dessert eagle and a 9mm caliber pistol
Ah ok, my mistake. It's good that you got some trigger time though, and on a couple legit shooters too.
That is a very nice looking handgun, I wouldn't mind having a go with that. It seems like you have a lot of research ahead of you comparing those that you've mentioned, have you shot with all of them or only this one so far? What would be the deciding factor do you think?
It's a nice shooter, I think you'd like it.
The research can take a while, but it's fun too, I mean it's shooting! 😋
All of those I mention in this post are good firearms, they have pros and cons of course, but all are capable. It'll come down to feel in the hand and when it cycles, the break of the trigger etc. Also if the test subject jammed or not. Ease of take-down (stripping for cleaning), overall cost and cost of magazines. Also the cool factor as well and a few other things like, with the Taurus, I'll have to get a holster made in the States, out of kydex. Easy done though.
I like where the optic sits on this one, a really cool feature, and it feels great so it's progressed to the short list.
There's some I may not be able to shoot, but most I will. It pays to be connected. 😉
I'm sure I would enjoy having a shoot with that Taurus. The research points are all good things to take into account, it sure does help that you'll be able to give most of them a try, will make the decision much easier. I'm not surprised this one has progressed to the short list. Looking forward to your decision. Assume you will do a post 😉
You assume correctly.
Very nice selection! The Taurus most certainly isn't cheap but it's a fine weapon for shooting and the ammunition is much less expensive. I've mainly shot 9 mm and 40 caliber because it used to be inexpensive, but these days nothing is cheap! I've never shot the 22 for accuracy but understand they do really well. Those are some great weapons you picked out!
Hi there, thanks for your comment?
The Taurus s indeed a decent shooter, what have been your experiences with it?
Yes, this is a line I think many of us will start to say more and more the way things are going.
It can be shot quite accurately, many target shooters will attest to that. My purpose of use is run and gun though, IPSC shooting.
Pretty awesome choice! I'll have to try one out to see how I like it. I've never had enough time to really get involved in IPSC, contract work drags me out of state most of the time.
I understand, it takes work to get the most out of (be good at) practical shooting so going away a lot won't help. Still, there's plenty of fun to be has just hitting the range from time to time and I hope you get the chance.
Though I don't own a firearm now, I believe I am a great lover of it and will look deeply Into it when I am in a justifiable country😁😁.
Other things that have checked out are a gadget since I plan on getting a new phone though not too soon but hopefully, I hope it is very soon.
Apart from research on the phone, I made a research on the power bank I got before getting it, things like its width, model, lightning input, micro USB input, capacity, and others are what I researched before getting it.
With research a person is more likely to get the right item the first time. I think we've all purchased something on a whim, it's ok sometimes, but a little research is the best way to go.
I know a few people who thought they'd enjoy shooting and when they got the chance, didn't. It's not for everyone. I hope you find it so when you try it.
Research makes us more knowledgeable about the item and getting the best is our utmost desire. And truly we get things on a whim😂😂. It is okay.
Hehe, I know I would and I do understand what you stated. Thank ya!
I know I'm late to this post. I personally want a Ruger Mark IV 22/45. I like the 1911 ergonomics. I like the Ruger brand. Parts are plentiful to customize and accessorize.
I've fired a Colt Woodsman. They're nice. I've seriously pondered a Browning Buck Mark, too. I have yet to pull the trigger on buying a .22 pistol though.
I've got a few Rugers (rifles) and agree, it's a good brand which I'm happy to shoot. I like the Mark IV 22/45 which I think I said in another comment and it's something I'd consider. It's not on my test list though as I don't need it to be, I'm familiar with it already. The Browning Buckmark is equally as good too.
Everything sounds strange to me...hahaha
And that's because I'm not familiar with guns, shooting and so on
That makes sense.
Congratulations @galenkp! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out our last posts: