I did respond to some of his argument above.
Also notice that he copy-pasted his wall-of-text as a reply to my post, without replying to anything I said.

I decided to focus on his point about knowing many methods of detection.

Why would he not want to share the methods?
With the anti-bot proposal we knew the methods of detection (Cloudfare).

As a community we need to know what measures will go in place, otherwise we can get banned without any explanation.

I'm not asking for an in-depth explanation. A name would be enough..

Or you think even knowing the name would compromise it? It doesn't sound like a very good method if simply knowing its name would make it ineffective..