You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust the efficiency of rented and delegated SPS

in Splinterlands2 months ago (edited)

I'm against this, but I got rid of all of my SPS, so I can't vote on it. haha. I think SPS was a huge mistake in general, and I know that no one is going to agree with me on that one. I think the game is still fun in some ways, but it's become a big, complicated, expensive mess in other ways. Right now, I mostly play Frontier and I bot Wild. I rent SPS for the latter. If something like this passed, I would probably just finally sell all of my old cards, even though they've lost so much of their value.

Good luck!

I almost wish we could use a ratio score instead of a set value, so if people stake it all for long enough, they can earn full rewards. But that would get exploited, too. Everything gets exploited, that's part of the problem. But if we made everyone buy or earn 100,000 SPS to get "full" rewards (which are still not that great), and SPS was actually at like $.50 or something... no one in the world is going to spend that much on it to stake it. And earning it would take so long, especially if renting wasn't as useful.

It's yet another in a long list of catch-22s in this game and any game like this, where people expect to earn things and don't want to (or can't) spend thousands of dollars to do it.