I agree, we shouldn't be changing cards after release, especially because the players are voting so. That is very dangerous. Let's not forget that the highest SPS holders can pass or block a proposal by themselves. If this passes, what's stopping them from buying many copies of a weak card (Nomos is a good example), submit a proposal to buff it, pass it, and sell for big profit? I'm not saying they will do that but we also don't know who might show up, buy a lot of SPS, and do that.
That's the worst part but every card game has bad cards. Why are people so focused on one specific weak card? I could imagine people wanting to change a very OP card. Tofu is OP but it's not the most OP card in the game. We allowed Kitty to run rampant for so long without a nerf. A very OP card is much more disruptive to the game than a weak card.
What if they nerf Tofu next? I own a max copy. If they nerf it, it will lose value. Why should I ever invest again just to risk the cards I invest into getting nerfed?
Which was my view when I wrote this post. The fact of the matter is the card is not actually weak in my view. Just the discontent players are expecting to play the card more often of which the card was not designed to fit everywhere