You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Informal Splinterlands DAO Proposal Idea: OPEN IF YOU DARE

If nothing else you started off a very positive trend of doing a pre-proposal post to first gauge interest and see what others have to offer you outside of discord. Well done, now the rest is gravy.
I prefer the 1 DEC minimum to be implemented first rather than card level minimums, then the market can simply work it out. You have the problem of say, perhaps, tough level 1 rares, epics or legendaries. That's why in a nutshell I prefer the 1 DEC rental minimum to let the market decide how much a card should be leveled up to be rented and perhaps just as important to make transactions in the rental market a minimum to avoid a spring to the bottom including these level 1 spam rentals.

Sort:  

thank you for your input!

my question would be would single bcx truly rent for 1 dec minimum tho? i think implementing a level minimum rather than 1 dec minimum is better because 1 DEC minimum can be manipulated. Suddenly there will be outcries of people complaining that rentals are expensive as single bcx is 1 DEC. If at peg, would anyone pay 1 DEC to rent a 1 bcx card worth 1 penny or possibly less? would anyone right now rent 1 bcx common for 1 DEC?

i learned today that 0.1 dec was not the minimum. i always thought that was bare minimum to even be put onto the rental market.

at bronze level, common, rares, epics, and legendary is as follows 3, 2, 2, 1
in which bronze would need 14 bcx, 5 bcx, 4 bcx, and 1 bcx.

setting 1 DEC rental as minimum would not improve circulation or the thousand of api interaction for single bcx cards.

we have impose card level restriction for full earning potential, cp restriction, etc but at the end of the gf bonus and guild bonus became the ultimate workaround these restrictions.

Yeah, that's also a solid point. We also could have level 2 commons renting for 0.10 or less as they are right now. While leveling up cards is a bit of an accomplishment, it's not "the end of a significant accomplishment." Can it be manipulated--yes it could, for more value for the buyer/renter, but at least there is a floor for transaction value. At one point before the season started this year there were like 17 cards that were maxed out renting for less than 1 DEC/day. Of course that is a bait and switch price (never intended to stick to this if rented more than 2 days), and a pure waste of time for whoever rented them at this price, which will be corrected when season rentals are implemented.

incorporating mini level and min price seems like a better idea

Thank you for your witness vote!
Have a !BEER on me!
To Opt-Out of my witness beer program just comment STOP below


Hey @cryptkeeper17, here is a little bit of BEER from @isnochys for you. Enjoy it!

We love your support by voting @detlev.witness on HIVE .

Thank you for your witness vote!
Have a !BEER on me!
To Opt-Out of my witness beer program just comment STOP below


Hey @cryptkeeper17, here is a little bit of BEER from @isnochys for you. Enjoy it!

Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your BEER.

Thank you for your witness vote!
Have a !BEER on me!
To Opt-Out of my witness beer program just comment STOP below


Hey @cryptkeeper17, here is a little bit of BEER from @isnochys for you. Enjoy it!

Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your BEER.