No one forked anyone's coins.
A new fork was created and new tokens were distributed to those who did not assist in the hostile takeover of the other chain.
No one lost tokens, no one had their tokens taken, they just didn't get free tokens.
No one forked anyone's coins.
A new fork was created and new tokens were distributed to those who did not assist in the hostile takeover of the other chain.
No one lost tokens, no one had their tokens taken, they just didn't get free tokens.
Yep, and if your personal bias wasn't so easily triggered you would notice that the sentiment was antiforking away anybody's coins.
I know you see much carnage, but paint me with a different brush, please.
If the same 50 accounts suck up the majority of the pool why would that 1000th and lower author even bother?
Not to say that golden children can't be an economy to themselves, but then we need to stop the illusion of being interested in new users, IMO.
In the interests of honest marketing, if such actually exists.
I really don't know what you are on about, but I have been monitoring New and trying to find people to curate and there hasn't been a lot of content to work with that wasn't actifit and other low effort content.
That doesn't surprise me.
I don't have a keyboard and can't make memes, others can't sign in when they want to, it's still moving day.
What I am going on about is something you said once predicting my future behavior.
I took that to be the essence of your evaluation of me, and I found it to be erroneous in some degree.
I've been checking the blocks produced and new post transactions are very few.
Sometimes 40 seconds or even a full minute pass between comment transactions
(this includes all posts, comments and post edits)