Let's fork again ! In fact not really a fork...
This time, let's start from scratch (just keep the code) : new chain, new witnesses, new balances.
No bad history, no bad actors.
A blockchain of the people, by the people, for the people
Just high on the whiff of liberty !
Yeah I could, but to be frank, I don't think all this is retrievable. I'm more eager to see (if that's still on the table) what @theoritical (and the whatever blockchain group) is working on.
Yes, I just prefer to lurk here though, not interested in creating a blockchain or whatever, there's enough of them out there already. I'm more of a spectator. But I hope problems of stake distribution and governance will be addressed, time will tell.
Having followed this saga, the town hall, the meetings with TRON and so on, you're one of the few people I discovered to be really benevolent. So thumbs up to you, I wish you the best !
I like the idea, but I think the momentum and notoriety we have here is valuable. Coding is one thing, and I can actually do that, but marketing is a whole other riskier ballgame.
If we can really solve our problems by this hard fork I think that's the best way to go. The Bitcoin forks have (shockingly) done okay for a while, especially compared to straight up restarts of Bitcoin.
I do think it's a viable plan C though if things go even farther south here.
Yep, and if your personal bias wasn't so easily triggered you would notice that the sentiment was antiforking away anybody's coins.
I know you see much carnage, but paint me with a different brush, please.
If the same 50 accounts suck up the majority of the pool why would that 1000th and lower author even bother?
Not to say that golden children can't be an economy to themselves, but then we need to stop the illusion of being interested in new users, IMO.
In the interests of honest marketing, if such actually exists.
I really don't know what you are on about, but I have been monitoring New and trying to find people to curate and there hasn't been a lot of content to work with that wasn't actifit and other low effort content.
That doesn't surprise me.
I don't have a keyboard and can't make memes, others can't sign in when they want to, it's still moving day.
What I am going on about is something you said once predicting my future behavior.
I took that to be the essence of your evaluation of me, and I found it to be erroneous in some degree.
Let's fork again ! In fact not really a fork...
This time, let's start from scratch (just keep the code) : new chain, new witnesses, new balances.
No bad history, no bad actors.
A blockchain of the people, by the people, for the people
Lol, I want two of what you are smoking!
I mean it sounds good, but can you run an RPC node?
Just high on the whiff of liberty !
Yeah I could, but to be frank, I don't think all this is retrievable. I'm more eager to see (if that's still on the table) what @theoritical (and the whatever blockchain group) is working on.
Yeah, steem 3.0 sounds good.
If they get the right takeaways from this mess.
All the code is up on GitHub.
Yes, I just prefer to lurk here though, not interested in creating a blockchain or whatever, there's enough of them out there already. I'm more of a spectator. But I hope problems of stake distribution and governance will be addressed, time will tell.
Having followed this saga, the town hall, the meetings with TRON and so on, you're one of the few people I discovered to be really benevolent. So thumbs up to you, I wish you the best !
I like the idea, but I think the momentum and notoriety we have here is valuable. Coding is one thing, and I can actually do that, but marketing is a whole other riskier ballgame.
If we can really solve our problems by this hard fork I think that's the best way to go. The Bitcoin forks have (shockingly) done okay for a while, especially compared to straight up restarts of Bitcoin.
I do think it's a viable plan C though if things go even farther south here.
No one forked anyone's coins.
A new fork was created and new tokens were distributed to those who did not assist in the hostile takeover of the other chain.
No one lost tokens, no one had their tokens taken, they just didn't get free tokens.
Yep, and if your personal bias wasn't so easily triggered you would notice that the sentiment was antiforking away anybody's coins.
I know you see much carnage, but paint me with a different brush, please.
If the same 50 accounts suck up the majority of the pool why would that 1000th and lower author even bother?
Not to say that golden children can't be an economy to themselves, but then we need to stop the illusion of being interested in new users, IMO.
In the interests of honest marketing, if such actually exists.
I really don't know what you are on about, but I have been monitoring New and trying to find people to curate and there hasn't been a lot of content to work with that wasn't actifit and other low effort content.
That doesn't surprise me.
I don't have a keyboard and can't make memes, others can't sign in when they want to, it's still moving day.
What I am going on about is something you said once predicting my future behavior.
I took that to be the essence of your evaluation of me, and I found it to be erroneous in some degree.
I've been checking the blocks produced and new post transactions are very few.
Sometimes 40 seconds or even a full minute pass between comment transactions
(this includes all posts, comments and post edits)