You can go directly to the English version by clicking 👉 HERE
ᕮᑎ ᎤᑌᏋ́ ᗪᕮᗰOᑎIOS ᕮSTOY ᑭᕮᑎSᗩᑎᗪO… 🤔
¡ℍ𝕠𝕝𝕒! 𝕍𝕒𝕞𝕠𝕤 𝕒 𝕕𝕚𝕤𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕒𝕣, 𝕒 𝕣𝕖𝕗𝕝𝕖𝕩𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣 𝕤𝕠𝕓𝕣𝕖 𝕖𝕝 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕕𝕠 𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕙𝕚𝕓𝕚𝕕𝕠𝕤 𝕪 𝕤𝕚 𝕖𝕤 𝕗𝕒𝕝𝕤𝕠 𝕠 𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕝, 𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕕𝕠 𝕖𝕟 𝕔𝕦𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕒 𝕝𝕒 𝕤𝕦𝕓𝕛𝕖𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕒 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕪 𝕝𝕒 𝕕𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕔𝕦𝕝𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝. ¿𝕋𝕖 𝕒𝕟𝕚𝕞𝕒𝕤?
𝔻𝕖𝕤𝕕𝕖 𝕙𝕒𝕔𝕖 𝕒𝕝𝕘𝕦𝕟𝕠𝕤 𝕕𝕚́𝕒𝕤, 𝕕𝕖𝕤𝕕𝕖 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕝𝕖𝕚́ 𝕝𝕒 𝕟𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝𝕖𝕫𝕒 𝕕𝕖𝕝 𝕣𝕖𝕥𝕠 𝕡𝕒𝕣𝕒 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕖 𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕒 ℂ𝕠𝕞𝕦𝕟𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕 #𝕫𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕕𝕖𝕖𝕤𝕔𝕒𝕝𝕠𝕗𝕣𝕚𝕠, 𝕙𝕖 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕒𝕕𝕠 𝕡𝕖𝕟𝕤𝕒𝕟𝕕𝕠 𝕖𝕟 𝕝𝕒 𝕟𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝𝕖𝕫𝕒 𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕒 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕪 𝕝𝕒 𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕣𝕒, 𝕦𝕟 𝕥𝕖𝕞𝕒 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕤𝕚𝕖𝕞𝕡𝕣𝕖 𝕙𝕒 𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕣𝕚𝕘𝕒𝕕𝕠 𝕒 𝕝𝕒 𝕙𝕦𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕. 𝔼𝕟 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕖 𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕕𝕠, 𝕤𝕖 𝕞𝕖 𝕙𝕒 𝕡𝕝𝕒𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕒𝕕𝕠 𝕦𝕟𝕒 𝕡𝕣𝕖𝕘𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕒 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕡𝕒𝕣𝕖𝕔𝕖 𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕚𝕝𝕝𝕒, 𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕠 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕚𝕖𝕣𝕣𝕒 𝕦𝕟𝕒 𝕔𝕠𝕞𝕡𝕝𝕖𝕛𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕒𝕓𝕝𝕖: ¿𝔼𝕤 𝕗𝕒𝕝𝕤𝕠 𝕠 𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕖𝕝 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕕𝕠 𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕙𝕚𝕓𝕚𝕕𝕠𝕤 𝕖𝕟 𝕖𝕝 𝕞𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕠? 𝔼𝕤𝕥𝕒 𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕣𝕠𝕘𝕒𝕟𝕥𝕖 𝕞𝕖 𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕧𝕒 𝕒 𝕣𝕖𝕗𝕝𝕖𝕩𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣 𝕤𝕠𝕓𝕣𝕖 𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠𝕤 𝕒𝕡𝕠́𝕔𝕣𝕚𝕗𝕠𝕤 𝕪 𝕠𝕥𝕣𝕠𝕤 𝕥𝕒𝕟𝕥𝕠𝕤 𝕢𝕦𝕖, 𝕒𝕦𝕟𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕟𝕠 𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕙𝕒𝕪𝕒𝕞𝕠𝕤 𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕕𝕠 𝕖𝕟 𝕟𝕦𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕤 𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕠𝕤, 𝕟𝕠 𝕤𝕚𝕘𝕟𝕚𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕒 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕟𝕠 𝕖𝕩𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕒𝕟.
ℙ𝕣𝕚𝕞𝕖𝕣𝕠, 𝕕𝕖𝕓𝕖𝕞𝕠𝕤 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕒𝕣 𝕖𝕝 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕔𝕖𝕡𝕥𝕠 𝕕𝕖 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕. 𝔻𝕖𝕤𝕕𝕖 𝕞𝕚 𝕡𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕠 𝕕𝕖 𝕧𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕒, 𝕝𝕒 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕖𝕤 𝕦𝕟𝕒 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕦𝕔𝕔𝕚𝕠́𝕟 𝕤𝕦𝕓𝕛𝕖𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕒. 𝕃𝕠 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕡𝕒𝕣𝕒 𝕞𝕚́ 𝕡𝕦𝕖𝕕𝕖 𝕤𝕖𝕣 𝕔𝕚𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕠, 𝕡𝕒𝕣𝕒 𝕠𝕥𝕣𝕒 𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕠𝕟𝕒 𝕕𝕖 𝕕𝕚𝕗𝕖𝕣𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕖 𝕔𝕦𝕝𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒 𝕠 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕩𝕥𝕠 𝕡𝕦𝕖𝕕𝕖 𝕤𝕖𝕣 𝕦𝕟𝕒 𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕣𝕒. 𝔸𝕤𝕚́, 𝕝𝕒 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕟𝕠 𝕖𝕤 𝕦𝕟 𝕒𝕓𝕤𝕠𝕝𝕦𝕥𝕠; 𝕖𝕤 𝕒𝕝𝕘𝕠 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕤𝕖 𝕞𝕠𝕝𝕕𝕖𝕒 𝕤𝕖𝕘𝕦́𝕟 𝕟𝕦𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕤 𝕖𝕩𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕤, 𝕔𝕣𝕖𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕤 𝕪 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕠𝕔𝕚𝕞𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕠𝕤. 𝔼𝕤𝕥𝕠 𝕟𝕠𝕤 𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕧𝕒 𝕒 𝕦𝕟 𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕣𝕖𝕟𝕠 𝕕𝕠𝕟𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕒 𝕝𝕚́𝕟𝕖𝕒 𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕣𝕖 𝕝𝕠 𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕝 𝕪 𝕝𝕠 𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕠 𝕤𝕖 𝕧𝕦𝕖𝕝𝕧𝕖 𝕕𝕚𝕗𝕦𝕤𝕒.
𝔸𝕝 𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕣 𝕖𝕝 𝕥𝕖𝕞𝕒 𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕙𝕚𝕓𝕚𝕕𝕠𝕤, 𝕝𝕒 𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕦𝕒𝕔𝕚𝕠́𝕟 𝕤𝕖 𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕟𝕒 𝕒𝕦́𝕟 𝕞𝕒́𝕤 𝕔𝕠𝕞𝕡𝕝𝕖𝕛𝕒. 𝕃𝕠𝕤 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠𝕤 𝕒𝕡𝕠́𝕔𝕣𝕚𝕗𝕠𝕤, 𝕡𝕠𝕣 𝕖𝕛𝕖𝕞𝕡𝕝𝕠, 𝕤𝕠𝕟 𝕥𝕖𝕩𝕥𝕠𝕤 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕟𝕠 𝕗𝕦𝕖𝕣𝕠𝕟 𝕚𝕟𝕔𝕝𝕦𝕚𝕕𝕠𝕤 𝕖𝕟 𝕖𝕝 𝕔𝕒𝕟𝕠𝕟 𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕒𝕤 𝕖𝕤𝕔𝕣𝕚𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕤 𝕤𝕒𝕘𝕣𝕒𝕕𝕒𝕤, 𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕠 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕖𝕟 𝕒𝕝𝕘𝕦𝕟𝕠𝕤 𝕔𝕒𝕤𝕠𝕤 𝕤𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕒𝕟 𝕕𝕖 𝕘𝕣𝕒𝕟 𝕧𝕒𝕝𝕠𝕣 𝕙𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕠́𝕣𝕚𝕔𝕠 𝕪 𝕔𝕦𝕝𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝. 𝔼𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕤 𝕥𝕖𝕩𝕥𝕠𝕤 𝕗𝕦𝕖𝕣𝕠𝕟 𝕖𝕩𝕔𝕝𝕦𝕚𝕕𝕠𝕤 𝕡𝕠𝕣 𝕕𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕒𝕤 𝕣𝕒𝕫𝕠𝕟𝕖𝕤, 𝕪𝕒 𝕤𝕖𝕒 𝕡𝕠𝕣 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕒𝕣𝕤𝕖 𝕙𝕖𝕣𝕖́𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕠𝕤, 𝕡𝕠𝕣 𝕡𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕣 𝕡𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕠𝕤 𝕕𝕖 𝕧𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕒 𝕠𝕡𝕦𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕤 𝕒 𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕠𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕝𝕖𝕤 (𝕟𝕖𝕔𝕖𝕤𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕒 𝕀𝕘𝕝𝕖𝕤𝕚𝕒), 𝕠 𝕤𝕚𝕞𝕡𝕝𝕖𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕖 𝕡𝕠𝕣𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕟𝕠 𝕤𝕖 𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕒𝕓𝕒𝕟 𝕔𝕠𝕟 𝕝𝕒𝕤 𝕕𝕠𝕔𝕥𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕒𝕤 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕒𝕓𝕝𝕖𝕔𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕤. ℙ𝕖𝕣𝕠, ¿𝕒𝕔𝕒𝕤𝕠 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕠 𝕤𝕚𝕘𝕟𝕚𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕒 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕤𝕦 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕕𝕠 𝕤𝕖𝕒 𝕗𝕒𝕝𝕤𝕠?
ℙ𝕒𝕣𝕒 𝕞𝕚́, 𝕥𝕠𝕕𝕠 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠 𝕥𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕖 𝕒𝕝𝕘𝕠 𝕕𝕖 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕, 𝕒𝕦𝕟𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕖́ 𝕒𝕕𝕠𝕣𝕟𝕒𝕕𝕠 𝕔𝕠𝕟 𝕒𝕟̃𝕒𝕕𝕚𝕕𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕤 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕝𝕠 𝕙𝕒𝕘𝕒𝕟 𝕞𝕒́𝕤 𝕒𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕠 𝕡𝕒𝕣𝕒 𝕖𝕝 𝕝𝕖𝕔𝕥𝕠𝕣. 𝕃𝕒 𝕙𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕚𝕒 𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕒 𝕝𝕚𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕒́ 𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕟𝕒 𝕕𝕖 𝕖𝕛𝕖𝕞𝕡𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕕𝕠𝕟𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕒 𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕔𝕚𝕠́𝕟 𝕪 𝕝𝕒 𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕤𝕖 𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕣𝕖𝕝𝕒𝕫𝕒𝕟 𝕕𝕖 𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕖𝕣𝕒 𝕚𝕟𝕤𝕖𝕡𝕒𝕣𝕒𝕓𝕝𝕖. 𝔸𝕦𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕖𝕤 𝕔𝕠𝕞𝕠 𝔾𝕒𝕓𝕣𝕚𝕖𝕝 𝔾𝕒𝕣𝕔𝕚́𝕒 𝕄𝕒́𝕣𝕢𝕦𝕖𝕫, 𝕔𝕠𝕟 𝕤𝕦 𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕞𝕠 𝕞𝕒́𝕘𝕚𝕔𝕠, 𝕠 𝔾𝕖𝕠𝕣𝕘𝕖 𝕆𝕣𝕨𝕖𝕝𝕝, 𝕔𝕠𝕟 𝕤𝕦 𝕕𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕡𝕚́𝕒 𝕖𝕟 “𝟙𝟡𝟠𝟜”, 𝕙𝕒𝕟 𝕔𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕕𝕠 𝕞𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕠𝕤 𝕢𝕦𝕖, 𝕒𝕦𝕟𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕠𝕤, 𝕣𝕖𝕗𝕝𝕖𝕛𝕒𝕟 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕𝕖𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕗𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕒𝕤 𝕤𝕠𝕓𝕣𝕖 𝕝𝕒 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕕𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕠́𝕟 𝕙𝕦𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕒 𝕪 𝕝𝕒 𝕤𝕠𝕔𝕚𝕖𝕕𝕒𝕕. 𝔼𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕤 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠𝕤, 𝕒𝕦𝕟𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕟𝕠 𝕤𝕖𝕒𝕟 “𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕠𝕤” 𝕖𝕟 𝕦𝕟 𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕕𝕠 𝕝𝕚𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕒𝕝, 𝕟𝕠𝕤 𝕠𝕗𝕣𝕖𝕔𝕖𝕟 𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕡𝕖𝕔𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕒𝕤 𝕧𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕤𝕒𝕤 𝕪 𝕟𝕠𝕤 𝕚𝕟𝕧𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕟 𝕒 𝕣𝕖𝕗𝕝𝕖𝕩𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕣.
𝔼𝕟𝕥𝕠𝕟𝕔𝕖𝕤, 𝕤𝕚 𝕒𝕡𝕝𝕚𝕔𝕒𝕞𝕠𝕤 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕖 𝕣𝕒𝕫𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕞𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕠 𝕒 𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕙𝕚𝕓𝕚𝕕𝕠𝕤, 𝕡𝕠𝕕𝕖𝕞𝕠𝕤 𝕒𝕗𝕚𝕣𝕞𝕒𝕣 𝕢𝕦𝕖, 𝕒𝕦𝕟𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕟𝕠 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕞𝕠𝕤 𝕕𝕖 𝕒𝕔𝕦𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕠 𝕔𝕠𝕟 𝕤𝕦 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕕𝕠, 𝕟𝕠 𝕤𝕚𝕘𝕟𝕚𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕒 𝕟𝕖𝕔𝕖𝕤𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕖 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕖 𝕤𝕖𝕒 𝕗𝕒𝕝𝕤𝕠. 𝕃𝕒 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕙𝕚𝕓𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕠́𝕟 𝕕𝕖 𝕦𝕟 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠 𝕒 𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕦𝕕𝕠 𝕥𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕖 𝕞𝕒́𝕤 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕧𝕖𝕣 𝕔𝕠𝕟 𝕖𝕝 𝕡𝕠𝕕𝕖𝕣 𝕪 𝕖𝕝 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕣𝕠𝕝 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟 𝕝𝕒 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕕𝕖 𝕤𝕦 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕕𝕠. 𝕃𝕠𝕤 𝕣𝕖𝕘𝕚́𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕖𝕤 𝕥𝕠𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕠𝕤, 𝕡𝕠𝕣 𝕖𝕛𝕖𝕞𝕡𝕝𝕠, 𝕙𝕒𝕟 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕙𝕚𝕓𝕚𝕕𝕠 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠𝕤 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕖𝕟 𝕡𝕖𝕝𝕚𝕘𝕣𝕠𝕤𝕠𝕤 𝕡𝕒𝕣𝕒 𝕖𝕝 𝕠𝕣𝕕𝕖𝕟 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕒𝕓𝕝𝕖𝕔𝕚𝕕𝕠, 𝕟𝕠 𝕡𝕠𝕣𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕤𝕖𝕒𝕟 𝕗𝕒𝕝𝕤𝕠𝕤, 𝕤𝕚𝕟𝕠 𝕡𝕠𝕣𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕡𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕟 𝕚𝕕𝕖𝕒𝕤 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕕𝕖𝕤𝕒𝕗𝕚𝕒𝕓𝕒𝕟 𝕤𝕦 𝕒𝕦𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕.
𝔸𝕕𝕖𝕞𝕒́𝕤, 𝕝𝕒 𝕕𝕦𝕕𝕒 𝕤𝕠𝕓𝕣𝕖 𝕝𝕒 𝕖𝕩𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕚𝕒 𝕕𝕖 𝕔𝕚𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕠𝕤 𝕥𝕖𝕩𝕥𝕠𝕤 𝕟𝕠 𝕕𝕖𝕓𝕖𝕣𝕚́𝕒 𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕧𝕒𝕣𝕟𝕠𝕤 𝕒 𝕕𝕖𝕤𝕔𝕒𝕣𝕥𝕒𝕣𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕒𝕦𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕒́𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕖. 𝕃𝕒 𝕗𝕒𝕝𝕥𝕒 𝕕𝕖 𝕒𝕔𝕔𝕖𝕤𝕠 𝕒 𝕦𝕟 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠 𝕟𝕠 𝕚𝕞𝕡𝕝𝕚𝕔𝕒 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕟𝕠 𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕘𝕒 𝕧𝕒𝕝𝕠𝕣 𝕠 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕤𝕦 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕕𝕠 𝕟𝕠 𝕤𝕖𝕒 𝕣𝕖𝕝𝕖𝕧𝕒𝕟𝕥𝕖. 𝔼𝕟 𝕦𝕟 𝕞𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕠 𝕕𝕠𝕟𝕕𝕖 𝕧𝕚𝕧𝕚𝕞𝕠𝕤 𝕤𝕦𝕞𝕖𝕣𝕘𝕚𝕕𝕠𝕤 𝕖𝕟 𝕟𝕦𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕡𝕚𝕒𝕤 𝕕𝕦𝕕𝕒𝕤, 𝕖𝕤 𝕗𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕒𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕝 𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕖𝕣 𝕦𝕟𝕒 𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕖 𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕒 𝕪 𝕔𝕣𝕚́𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕒.
𝔸 𝕔𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕚𝕒 𝕔𝕚𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕒, ¿𝕢𝕦𝕚𝕖́𝕟 𝕥𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕖 𝕝𝕒 𝕣𝕒𝕫𝕠́𝕟? 𝔼𝕤 𝕦𝕟𝕒 𝕡𝕣𝕖𝕘𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕒 𝕤𝕚𝕟 𝕦𝕟𝕒 𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕡𝕦𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕒 𝕕𝕖𝕗𝕚𝕟𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕒. 𝕃𝕒 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕖𝕤 𝕦𝕟 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕔𝕖𝕡𝕥𝕠 𝕖𝕟 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕥𝕒𝕟𝕥𝕖 𝕖𝕧𝕠𝕝𝕦𝕔𝕚𝕠́𝕟, 𝕞𝕠𝕝𝕕𝕖𝕒𝕕𝕠 𝕡𝕠𝕣 𝕟𝕦𝕖𝕧𝕒𝕤 𝕖𝕩𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕤 𝕪 𝕕𝕖𝕤𝕔𝕦𝕓𝕣𝕚𝕞𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕠𝕤. 𝕃𝕠 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕙𝕠𝕪 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕒𝕞𝕠𝕤 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕠 𝕡𝕦𝕖𝕕𝕖 𝕤𝕖𝕣 𝕔𝕦𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕕𝕠 𝕞𝕒𝕟̃𝕒𝕟𝕒, 𝕪 𝕧𝕚𝕔𝕖𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕒, 𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕠 𝕕𝕖 𝕒𝕔𝕦𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕠 𝕒 𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕖𝕤 𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕝𝕖𝕤 𝕕𝕖 𝕔𝕚𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕒𝕤 𝕠𝕣𝕘𝕒𝕟𝕚𝕫𝕒𝕔𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕖𝕤, 𝕞𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕤 𝕞𝕒́𝕤 𝕤𝕖𝕘𝕦𝕣𝕠 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕖́ 𝕖𝕝 𝕤𝕖𝕔𝕣𝕖𝕥𝕠, 𝕞𝕖𝕛𝕠𝕣 𝕡𝕒𝕣𝕒 𝕖𝕝𝕝𝕠𝕤. 𝕍𝕚𝕧𝕚𝕞𝕠𝕤 𝕖𝕟 𝕦𝕟 𝕞𝕒𝕣 𝕕𝕖 𝕚𝕟𝕔𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕚𝕕𝕦𝕞𝕓𝕣𝕖𝕤 𝕪, 𝕖𝕟 𝕝𝕦𝕘𝕒𝕣 𝕕𝕖 𝕓𝕦𝕤𝕔𝕒𝕣 𝕔𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕖𝕫𝕒𝕤 𝕒𝕓𝕤𝕠𝕝𝕦𝕥𝕒𝕤, 𝕕𝕖𝕓𝕖𝕣𝕚́𝕒𝕞𝕠𝕤 𝕒𝕔𝕖𝕡𝕥𝕒𝕣 𝕝𝕒 𝕔𝕠𝕞𝕡𝕝𝕖𝕛𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕪 𝕝𝕒 𝕒𝕞𝕓𝕚𝕘𝕦̈𝕖𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕔𝕠𝕞𝕠 𝕡𝕒𝕣𝕥𝕖 𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕣𝕚́𝕟𝕤𝕖𝕔𝕒 𝕕𝕖 𝕟𝕦𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒 𝕖𝕩𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕚𝕒.
ℂ𝕣𝕖𝕠, 𝕗𝕚𝕣𝕞𝕖𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕖, 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕖𝕝 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕕𝕠 𝕕𝕖 𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕝𝕚𝕓𝕣𝕠𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕙𝕚𝕓𝕚𝕕𝕠𝕤, 𝕒𝕝 𝕚𝕘𝕦𝕒𝕝 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕔𝕦𝕒𝕝𝕢𝕦𝕚𝕖𝕣 𝕠𝕥𝕣𝕠 𝕥𝕖𝕩𝕥𝕠, 𝕥𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕖 𝕖𝕝𝕖𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕠𝕤 𝕕𝕖 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕪 𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕔𝕚𝕠́𝕟, 𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕠 𝕤𝕦𝕓𝕛𝕖𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕠. 𝕃𝕒 𝕔𝕝𝕒𝕧𝕖 𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕒́ 𝕖𝕟 𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕣𝕝𝕠𝕤 𝕔𝕠𝕟 𝕦𝕟𝕒 𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕖 𝕔𝕣𝕚́𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕒 𝕪 𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕒, 𝕣𝕖𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕠𝕔𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕕𝕠 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕝𝕒 𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕟𝕠 𝕖𝕤 𝕦𝕟 𝕞𝕠𝕟𝕠𝕝𝕚𝕥𝕠 𝕚𝕟𝕞𝕠́𝕧𝕚𝕝, 𝕤𝕚𝕟𝕠 𝕦𝕟𝕒 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕦𝕔𝕔𝕚𝕠́𝕟 𝕕𝕚𝕟𝕒́𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕒 𝕢𝕦𝕖 𝕣𝕖𝕗𝕝𝕖𝕛𝕒 𝕟𝕦𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒 𝕕𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕪 𝕔𝕠𝕞𝕡𝕝𝕖𝕛𝕚𝕕𝕒𝕕 𝕔𝕠𝕞𝕠 𝕤𝕖𝕣𝕖𝕤 𝕙𝕦𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕠𝕤.
«Iniciativa: 📚Libros Prohibidos 🚫 | ¡Ventanas a otros mundos!»
Una propuesta de la Comunidad
CRÉDITOS:
Publicaciones anteriores relacionadas con este tema:
🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆
Dedicado a todos aquellos que contribuyen, día a día, a hacer de nuestro planeta, un mundo mejor.
🤔 ᗯᕼᗩT Tᕼᕮ ᕼᕮᒪᒪ ᗩᗰ I TᕼIᑎKIᑎG…
𝙷𝚎𝚢! 𝚆𝚎 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚐𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗, 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕, 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚢. 𝙰𝚛𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚞𝚙 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚒𝚝?
𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝚊 𝚏𝚎𝚠 𝚍𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚠, 𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝙸 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚑 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 #𝚣𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚘𝚏𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚢, 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚜, 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚎𝚍 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚢. 𝙸𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚍, 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚖𝚜 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚝𝚢: 𝙸𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍'𝚜 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕? 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚜 𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚌𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚕 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚢 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑, 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚏 𝚠𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚑𝚎𝚕𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖 𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚜, 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝.
𝙵𝚒𝚛𝚜𝚝, 𝚠𝚎 𝚖𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑. 𝙸𝚗 𝚖𝚢 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠, 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚝. 𝚆𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚊 𝚕𝚒𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝. 𝚃𝚑𝚞𝚜, 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚎; 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜, 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚏𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚍𝚐𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚜 𝚞𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚖 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚋𝚕𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚍.
𝚆𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚍𝚍𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡. 𝙰𝚙𝚘𝚌𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚕 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎, 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚍𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚊𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚙𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚜 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚍𝚎𝚍 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊 𝚟𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚜, 𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕, 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠𝚜 𝚘𝚙𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚘𝚏𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 (𝚌𝚑𝚞𝚛𝚌𝚑 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚢), 𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚍𝚒𝚍 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚐𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚍𝚘𝚌𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜. 𝙱𝚞𝚝 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎?
𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚎, 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚗 𝚒𝚝, 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚏 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚍𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚒𝚝 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚛. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚞𝚕𝚕 𝚘𝚏 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚠𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚍. 𝙰𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚊𝚜 𝙶𝚊𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚕 𝙶𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚒́𝚊 𝙼𝚊́𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚣, 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚖, 𝚘𝚛 𝙶𝚎𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚎 𝙾𝚛𝚠𝚎𝚕𝚕, 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚢𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚊 𝚒𝚗 ‘𝟷𝟿𝟾𝟺’, 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝, 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕, 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢. 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝 ‘𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚎’ 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚎, 𝚘𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚜 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝.
𝚂𝚘, 𝚒𝚏 𝚠𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚠𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚊𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚏 𝚠𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝, 𝚒𝚝 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚕𝚢 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎. 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚘𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚙𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝. 𝚃𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚜, 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎, 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚛, 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚢.
𝙼𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛, 𝚍𝚘𝚞𝚋𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚜 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖. 𝙻𝚊𝚌𝚔 𝚘𝚏 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚝 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚘 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚝. 𝙸𝚗 𝚊 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚘𝚠𝚗 𝚍𝚘𝚞𝚋𝚝𝚜, 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚘 𝚔𝚎𝚎𝚙 𝚊𝚗 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚍.
𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚞𝚛𝚎, 𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝? 𝙸𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚠𝚎𝚛. 𝚃𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚎𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝, 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚜. 𝚆𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚊𝚢 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚘𝚠, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚟𝚒𝚌𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚏𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚝, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖. 𝚆𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚊 𝚘𝚏 𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍, 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚜, 𝚠𝚎 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎.
𝙸 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚢 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝, 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚔𝚎𝚢 𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚊𝚌𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚗 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚍, 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚐𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚑, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚊 𝚍𝚢𝚗𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚌 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚜 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚜.
«Initiative: 📚 Banned Books 🚫 Windows to other worlds!»
A Community proposal
CREDITS:
Previous publications related to this topic:
🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆
Dedicated to all those poets who contribute, day by day, to make our planet a better world.
«Iniciativa: 📚Libros Prohibidos 🚫 | ¡Ventanas a otros mundos!»
Una propuesta de la Comunidad
CRÉDITOS:
Publicaciones anteriores relacionadas con este tema:
Dedicado a todos aquellos que contribuyen, día a día, a hacer de nuestro planeta, un mundo mejor.
🤔 ᗯᕼᗩT Tᕼᕮ ᕼᕮᒪᒪ ᗩᗰ I TᕼIᑎKIᑎG…
𝙷𝚎𝚢! 𝚆𝚎 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚐𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗, 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕, 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚢. 𝙰𝚛𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚞𝚙 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚒𝚝?
𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝚊 𝚏𝚎𝚠 𝚍𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚠, 𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝙸 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚑 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 #𝚣𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚘𝚏𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚢, 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚜, 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚎𝚍 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚢. 𝙸𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚍, 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚖𝚜 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚝𝚢: 𝙸𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍'𝚜 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕? 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚜 𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚌𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚕 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚢 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑, 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚏 𝚠𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚑𝚎𝚕𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖 𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚜, 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝.
𝙵𝚒𝚛𝚜𝚝, 𝚠𝚎 𝚖𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑. 𝙸𝚗 𝚖𝚢 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠, 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚝. 𝚆𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚊 𝚕𝚒𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝. 𝚃𝚑𝚞𝚜, 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚎; 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜, 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚏𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚍𝚐𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚜 𝚞𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚖 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚋𝚕𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚍.
𝚆𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚍𝚍𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡. 𝙰𝚙𝚘𝚌𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚕 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎, 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚍𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚊𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚙𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚜 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚍𝚎𝚍 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊 𝚟𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚜, 𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕, 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠𝚜 𝚘𝚙𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚘𝚏𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 (𝚌𝚑𝚞𝚛𝚌𝚑 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚢), 𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚍𝚒𝚍 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚐𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚍𝚘𝚌𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜. 𝙱𝚞𝚝 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎?
𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚎, 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚗 𝚒𝚝, 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚏 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚍𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚒𝚝 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚛. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚞𝚕𝚕 𝚘𝚏 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚠𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚍. 𝙰𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚊𝚜 𝙶𝚊𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚕 𝙶𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚒́𝚊 𝙼𝚊́𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚣, 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚖, 𝚘𝚛 𝙶𝚎𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚎 𝙾𝚛𝚠𝚎𝚕𝚕, 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚢𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚊 𝚒𝚗 ‘𝟷𝟿𝟾𝟺’, 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝, 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕, 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢. 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝 ‘𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚎’ 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚎, 𝚘𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚜 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝.
𝚂𝚘, 𝚒𝚏 𝚠𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚠𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚊𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚏 𝚠𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝, 𝚒𝚝 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚕𝚢 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎. 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚘𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚙𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝. 𝚃𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚜, 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎, 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚛, 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚢.
𝙼𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛, 𝚍𝚘𝚞𝚋𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚜 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖. 𝙻𝚊𝚌𝚔 𝚘𝚏 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚝 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚘 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚝. 𝙸𝚗 𝚊 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚘𝚠𝚗 𝚍𝚘𝚞𝚋𝚝𝚜, 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚘 𝚔𝚎𝚎𝚙 𝚊𝚗 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚍.
𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚞𝚛𝚎, 𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝? 𝙸𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚠𝚎𝚛. 𝚃𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚎𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝, 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚜. 𝚆𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚊𝚢 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚘𝚠, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚟𝚒𝚌𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚏𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚝, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖. 𝚆𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚊 𝚘𝚏 𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍, 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚜, 𝚠𝚎 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎.
𝙸 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚢 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝, 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚔𝚎𝚢 𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚊𝚌𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚗 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚍, 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚐𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚑, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚊 𝚍𝚢𝚗𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚌 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚜 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚜.
«Initiative: 📚 Banned Books 🚫 Windows to other worlds!»
A Community proposal
CREDITS:
Previous publications related to this topic:
🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆****🔆
Dedicated to all those poets who contribute, day by day, to make our planet a better world.
𝙷𝚎𝚢! 𝚆𝚎 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚐𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗, 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕, 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚢. 𝙰𝚛𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚞𝚙 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚒𝚝?
𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝚊 𝚏𝚎𝚠 𝚍𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚠, 𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝙸 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚑 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 #𝚣𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚘𝚏𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚢, 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚜, 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚎𝚍 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚢. 𝙸𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚍, 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚖𝚜 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚝𝚢: 𝙸𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍'𝚜 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕? 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚜 𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚌𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚕 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚢 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑, 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚏 𝚠𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚑𝚎𝚕𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖 𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚜, 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝.
𝙵𝚒𝚛𝚜𝚝, 𝚠𝚎 𝚖𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑. 𝙸𝚗 𝚖𝚢 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠, 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚝. 𝚆𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚊 𝚕𝚒𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝. 𝚃𝚑𝚞𝚜, 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚎; 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜, 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚏𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚍𝚐𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚜 𝚞𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚖 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚋𝚕𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚍.
𝚆𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚍𝚍𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡. 𝙰𝚙𝚘𝚌𝚛𝚢𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚕 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎, 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚍𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚊𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚙𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚜 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚍𝚎𝚍 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊 𝚟𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚜, 𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕, 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠𝚜 𝚘𝚙𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚘𝚏𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 (𝚌𝚑𝚞𝚛𝚌𝚑 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚢), 𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚍𝚒𝚍 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚐𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚍𝚘𝚌𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚜. 𝙱𝚞𝚝 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎?
𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚎, 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚗 𝚒𝚝, 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚏 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚍𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚒𝚝 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚛. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚞𝚕𝚕 𝚘𝚏 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚠𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚍. 𝙰𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚊𝚜 𝙶𝚊𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚕 𝙶𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚒́𝚊 𝙼𝚊́𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚣, 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚖, 𝚘𝚛 𝙶𝚎𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚎 𝙾𝚛𝚠𝚎𝚕𝚕, 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚢𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚊 𝚒𝚗 ‘𝟷𝟿𝟾𝟺’, 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝, 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕, 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢. 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝 ‘𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚎’ 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚎, 𝚘𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚜 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝.
𝚂𝚘, 𝚒𝚏 𝚠𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚠𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚊𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚏 𝚠𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝, 𝚒𝚝 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚕𝚢 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎. 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚘𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚙𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝. 𝚃𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚜, 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎, 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚛, 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚎, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚢.
𝙼𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛, 𝚍𝚘𝚞𝚋𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚜 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚞𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖. 𝙻𝚊𝚌𝚔 𝚘𝚏 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚝 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚘 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚝. 𝙸𝚗 𝚊 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚘𝚠𝚗 𝚍𝚘𝚞𝚋𝚝𝚜, 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚘 𝚔𝚎𝚎𝚙 𝚊𝚗 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚍.
𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚞𝚛𝚎, 𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝? 𝙸𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚠𝚎𝚛. 𝚃𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚎𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝, 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚜. 𝚆𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚊𝚢 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚘𝚠, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚟𝚒𝚌𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚏𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚝, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖. 𝚆𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚊 𝚘𝚏 𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍, 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚜, 𝚠𝚎 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎.
𝙸 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜, 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚢 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝, 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚔𝚎𝚢 𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚊𝚌𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚗 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚍, 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚐𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚑, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚊 𝚍𝚢𝚗𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚌 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚜 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚜.
«Initiative: 📚 Banned Books 🚫 Windows to other worlds!»
A Community proposal
CREDITS:
Previous publications related to this topic:
Dedicated to all those poets who contribute, day by day, to make our planet a better world.