As we approach 2026, perfection is suspicious. With the rise of tools like ChatGPT, perfectly polished writing often signals AI rather than than expertise or talent.
Ahora que nos acercamos al 2026, la perfección levanta sospechas. Con el auge de herramientas como ChatGPT, una redacción demasiado perfecta a menudo grita IA en lugar de experiencia o talento.
In this clip, Michaela Alexis explains why in the AI age a typo, a stutter, or a simple sentence is now the ultimate proof of humanity. That's right, making mistakes could actually be your best strategy for building trust.
En este clip, Michaela Alexis explica por qué, en la era de la inteligencia artificial, un error de dedo, tartamudear o usar una frase sencilla es ahora la prueba definitiva de humanidad. Así es, cometer errores podría ser tu mejor estrategia para generar confianza.
We discuss the Grade 3 Reading Level secret for LinkedIn and why sounding fancy or academic is killing your engagement. If you want to be trustworthy, you have to stop trying to be perfect.
Platicamos sobre el secreto del Nivel de lectura de tercero de primaria para LinkedIn y por qué sonar muy sofisticado o académico está matando tu engagement. Si quieres generar confianza, tienes que dejar de intentar ser perfecto.
Click here 👉 Coaching & Training if you want to learn more about my coaching services.
If you’d like to be tagged whenever I post something new, just let me know, and I’ll be happy to add you. You can be removed anytime you wish, no worries. And if you’re already on the list, thank you! 😊
@dreemsteem, @deraaa, @stdd, @palomap3, @salicj, @samsmith1971, @jane1289, @foxkoit, @melinda010100, @kenechukwu97, @bluefinstudios, @sacra97, @gr33nm4ster, @weone, @funshee, @hafiz34, @ismartboy, @manclar, @ravenmus1c, @ph1102, @gretelarmfeg, @caleblord, @pauliinasoilu
I still haven't seen any perfect posts by AI. I've wondered if their errors are real, or if they're fabricated to appear more human.
I see what you are saying, but I think the point is that for many purposes, they are "perfect enough" or better than some humans when writing content. In fact, it very possible that many "copy-paste" content.
In my case, I use AI to polish my content for example, but I don't publish AI content generated content, do you what I mean?
I believe there is AI that make AI generated text to appear more human.
Thanks for watching and commenting!
Sorry to interfere. I saw someone write a story about his life experience, and the reviewer called it AI on one of the Hive platforms. I was shocked because when I came across that story, I knew he wasn’t lying.
The AI detector used said that the content had only one error and that it was too formal. Ever since then, my friend deliberately makes a lot of blunders, and he says that it is intentional.
For me, I prefer to write in a conversational way, linking everything to myself and using dialogue and slang too. But I feel it is a sin to use AI to correct errors. What do you think? I am learning, sir.
Yeah, I know what you mean, but I don't know how some curators make such assesements or decisions.
I think there is a fine line. Some people might be using AI and then add errors. I think that would be wrong. Normal errors are just that, errors.
I try to use conversational language when I write, and some other times I use a more profesional style. It depends.
And no, I don't think it's a sin to use AI to correct errors. I think it's wrong to copy-paste non-original material or AI generated material. You know what I mean?
You just hit the nail on the head. I love this response—exactly. God bless you, sir, for the clarification.
When AI first started becoming prevalent, I was frequently accused of being an AI, on this and other platforms. I didn't change my style, just waited for everyone to realize that I've always written like this, and I HATE AI! It took a while, but most of the people (and some of the bots) now recognize that I may be abnormal, but I'm still fully human.
Hmmm! AI is causing humans to doubt humans. This kinds of tell me not to compromise in the issues of AI. Thanks for sharing this...
Great 👍
Thanks!
You welcome sir
Tag me.
Gladly, thank you!
I would have love to say a lot but this post says a lot about everything... Additionally, of recent, a shadow photo that I took was called AI, I was pissed off and decided to quit blogging and focus on my academics.
Actually, I think with the metadata It's very easy to proof if a photo is AI or taken with a camara or phone. Again, I don't know how the curator came to that conclusion.
Don't be discourage. Find the right communities and keep posting.
Well said! Doubts cleared... Exactly, it was not one, not three pictures but this post has enlightened me.