Measuring the financial value of a post is a complicated thing (in fact, everything that involves money is), and it ends up having a very personal weight.
Considering the ecosystem as a whole (as an extension that connects people) and all the whales, orcas and double dolphins that are part of it, I don't think the value of this post is high (because it has a relevant and well-written subject).
That's a difficult one. It depends what you value most I suppose. It also needs to be seen relative to other posts and I'm not familar, as you are, how much other posts do and don't earn. $90 is way more than I ever earn but then my posts don't generate this level of discussion.
i agree with both @wiseagent and @friendlymoose points about the rewards being spread out more and higher rewards being given to people who make a lot of effort. But, when I read your post, I couldn't really think of any solution to the points you made.
It depends what decision you mean. We can all decrease the value of a post with a downvote. But downvotes are not very commonly used for this. But they can...
I also suggested to configure a maximum reward for posts. I think would need to be changed in the blockchain. I don't know who decides these kind of changes.
Maybe @acidyo knows.
Value is a matter of opinion. As a Hive OG you can benefit from your connections (as do I), but we have creative people making art and music who struggle to make $5 on a post. I tend to focus on those as we need more of that. Just my choice :)
When I compare it to the average rewards of similar posts and the effort that has been done to make the post (my assumption) I do think it is a bit overrewarded.
But since there are a lot of interactions on you blog make it blog more valuable.
In my opinion, the author of the content is just as significant as the content itself. For someone as influential as you, people recognize the value in your words. There is a high level of trust in what you say, and even a few missteps can spark discussions. So yes, it's worthit.
Measuring the financial value of a post is a complicated thing (in fact, everything that involves money is), and it ends up having a very personal weight.
Considering the ecosystem as a whole (as an extension that connects people) and all the whales, orcas and double dolphins that are part of it, I don't think the value of this post is high (because it has a relevant and well-written subject).
Speaking of which... What I really miss is seeing more relevant posts receiving the same kind of rewards (or at least something more substantial).
Projects with higher voting weight should look more broadly at other users. Curation work isn't easy, but could be (even) better.
That's a difficult one. It depends what you value most I suppose. It also needs to be seen relative to other posts and I'm not familar, as you are, how much other posts do and don't earn. $90 is way more than I ever earn but then my posts don't generate this level of discussion.
i agree with both @wiseagent and @friendlymoose points about the rewards being spread out more and higher rewards being given to people who make a lot of effort. But, when I read your post, I couldn't really think of any solution to the points you made.
I've suggested in one of the comments to assemble a think tank to discuss some of the ideas that were mentioned in the blog and the comments.
Do you know who it is who actually makes these types of decisions. Is it just the top 20 witnesses?
It depends what decision you mean. We can all decrease the value of a post with a downvote. But downvotes are not very commonly used for this. But they can...
No. I meant the bigger decisions like how votes are paid out. The split, the dust amount etc. etc.
I don't know that either.
I also suggested to configure a maximum reward for posts. I think would need to be changed in the blockchain. I don't know who decides these kind of changes.
Maybe @acidyo knows.
Value is a matter of opinion. As a Hive OG you can benefit from your connections (as do I), but we have creative people making art and music who struggle to make $5 on a post. I tend to focus on those as we need more of that. Just my choice :)
When I compare it to the average rewards of similar posts and the effort that has been done to make the post (my assumption) I do think it is a bit overrewarded.
But since there are a lot of interactions on you blog make it blog more valuable.
I would rather see lower rewards and the total reward pool divided over more users.
no comment?
Honestly it was well written and was presented in a serious and view changing manner, so yeah i feel it was worth some value :)
I am going to need a snap sized summary lol. Congrats on the big reward!
In my opinion, the author of the content is just as significant as the content itself. For someone as influential as you, people recognize the value in your words. There is a high level of trust in what you say, and even a few missteps can spark discussions. So yes, it's worthit.