Experimental medical products cannot be mandated. Unapproved medical products cannot be mandated. But despite this, with a product that's been around for less than a year since it was developed in 2020 and not properly tested for safety, there is a push to mandate an unapproved and experimental injection against COVID.
Despite this myopic push by the mainstream narrative in the media, governments and their approved medical experts, many other experts are sounding the alarm in rejection of these experimental injections. One insidious vector of these experimental injections is to force them onto children who are far from needing it in any way.
The Government is facing a backlash over plans to extend the vaccine rollout to children, with some experts questioning the benefits of the proposed move.
Dozens of medics, doctors and scientists have written to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) to express their “grave concern” over the proposals.
In a joint letter, they warned it is "irresponsible, unethical and unnecessary" to jab children and urged the medicines watchdog not to "repeat mistakes from history".
Their intervention came as Matt Hancock announced that Britain had bought enough Pfizer vaccines to inoculate all children over the age of 12.
The Health Secretary said the Government would be "very, very careful and sensitive" about whether to roll out the vaccination programme to children, but stressed that research showed the jabs were safe.
Despite warnings not to repeat mistakes in history, this is exactly what governments are pushing forward with. Irresponsible, unethical and unnecessary experimental injections with dangerous side effects being pushed onto children.
The letter, organised by Dr Ros Jones, a retired consultant paediatrician and member of Health Advisory and Recovery Team, warns the MHRA of the dangers of vaccines which are “rushed to market”.
“We must not be the generation of adults that, through unnecessary haste and fear, risks the health of children.”
“All medical interventions carry a risk of harm, so we have a duty to act with caution and proportionality,” it says.
“This is particularly the case when considering mass intervention in a healthy population, in which situation there must be firm evidence of benefits far greater than harms”.
never before in history has a healthy population been quarantined. Healthy people are being treated as though they are sick. That's what the model was being pushed in the media and governments for a time that to assume you are sick and act accordingly, even though you aren't.
Assuming you are sick with something that if you actually were sick, has a 0.002% risk of death for children, an overall fatality rate of 0.3 with all age groups which includes the age group that is most affected which is over 70 years old and were most of the alleged unconfirmed deaths "from covid" are from.