I find it ironic that for someone who doesn't seem to understand the difference from prejudice and judgment as they relate judgement as nothing but prejudice you make value judgements about people who seemingly trust the various mainstream media, calling them idiots and morons, unable to think logically. I would examine how to get their attention as you're over here preaching to the choir, which is neither productive or insightful and revealing, as you imply that they somehow have the benefit of observing the inconsistencies of 'impossible shot' and 'buildings falling on their own footprint' and gleaming the 'truth' as you have. Most people, overwhelming majority, 78% or more, claim the media is the enemy of the people, and the remaining are either the naive, work in/for the media, or are stooges who responded despite their lack of trust in the media institutions that they trust it, so how does any of this "Stoopid people" rhetoric help anyone bridge the gap between the naive minority to the majority, or better yet, how does the silent majority find it's voice to respond in resounding unison so that such dissonance, division and defeatism as 'Stoopid people' doesn't take the stage?

But don't hurt your only two functioning brain cells, and furthermore I'd say you're not emotionally integrated enough to recognize divisive and diminutive discourse when it leaves your mouth so tough chance at bringing forth a cohesive or comprehensive response.