Hivewatchers-helper has no clue about Curie. Others at hivewatchers could easily contact Curie people if they want to. They know who to talk. It’s always easy to point fingers rather than have something of substance to say. If you see any abuse report to Curie on discord with evidence.
I am not part of Hive Watchers, and I have spent the majority of my time on Steem/Hive identifying and stopping abuse but I recently step down to leave it to those who care to do it.
While I agree those who cover up and hide criminals are guilty as well (to some extent), it is up to the community to step in if someone is voting in a way that harms the platform, yet very few do. In terms of curation sniping, there is very little you can do as flagging their votes just flags an innocent third party and the majority of stake holders here are just curation sniping. Many doing it with as little vote as they can to get maximum rewards rather than sincerely supporting people.
To answer your question, there really isn't much that can be done. The majority of stake is not voting based on quality.
The next hard fork will include a mechanism to reduce the effectiveness of curation sniping to some extent™.
Curie is a old and well know account/community. At one point it was more organized and benevolent. From what I have heard (and I haven't done a lot of research myself as I stepped away from abuse fighting for various reasons) it has lost its way.
What "scammer" posts do you refer to? All I saw in the screenshot was complaining about Curie's voting.
yayogerardo was moved to "timeout" channel a few days ago after few warnings to stop engaging in appeals in our name without our permission, and for general trolling and arguing with various hiveians. He is also walden's buddy.
Hivewatchers-helper has no clue about Curie. Others at hivewatchers could easily contact Curie people if they want to. They know who to talk. It’s always easy to point fingers rather than have something of substance to say. If you see any abuse report to Curie on discord with evidence.
I am not part of Hive Watchers, and I have spent the majority of my time on Steem/Hive identifying and stopping abuse but I recently step down to leave it to those who care to do it.
While I agree those who cover up and hide criminals are guilty as well (to some extent), it is up to the community to step in if someone is voting in a way that harms the platform, yet very few do. In terms of curation sniping, there is very little you can do as flagging their votes just flags an innocent third party and the majority of stake holders here are just curation sniping. Many doing it with as little vote as they can to get maximum rewards rather than sincerely supporting people.
To answer your question, there really isn't much that can be done. The majority of stake is not voting based on quality.
The next hard fork will include a mechanism to reduce the effectiveness of curation sniping to some extent™.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Curie is a old and well know account/community. At one point it was more organized and benevolent. From what I have heard (and I haven't done a lot of research myself as I stepped away from abuse fighting for various reasons) it has lost its way.
What "scammer" posts do you refer to? All I saw in the screenshot was complaining about Curie's voting.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
yayogerardo was moved to "timeout" channel a few days ago after few warnings to stop engaging in appeals in our name without our permission, and for general trolling and arguing with various hiveians. He is also walden's buddy.
That's something you need to take up with them.
I can't help you with that.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Come to Curie discord with evidence, tag me or dm me. We will get it fixed if there is an abuse.
I'm more of a Choice D kind of guy
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta