One more thing, And the justification for your argument, if the practical data is to show that people like me(abuse users that you think) has outstanding returns by votetrading compaired with whales(over 50,000), and witnesses, even not your calculation, many vote-traders would agree. I'm curious about that too. You can use my average annual rate of return. However, rather than comparing with people with less power, the data also show the average returns of whales and other witnesses that everyone judges reasonably. Of course, including you.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You don't need to fetch data to prove that votetrading gives you better returns than not, it's quite simple. Compare yourself to any other user of similar stake and you will notice their post rewards will either vary in amounts or have more unique voters or depend on each and every content of the post. Some may get more than from votetrading while others and a majority would get less if they actively posted once per day for instance. Most of them would get rewards similar in % from their curation but they either have many people they autovote or follow a curation trail or vote manually, not exchange direct votes with similar sized stakeholders just because it guarantees them the highest returns for close to no effort or what's even worse no matter the effort or content. It defeats the purpose of curation, content and the value of earned rewards from proof of brain not to mention the need to be social and gain attention as is not hard to see since this is your first comment in weeks just because of cause of the downvotes and your posts barely get any views yet you earn the same no matter if it's a photo, video or YouTube movie trailer you're sharing.