Now my question is that since they didn't employ you for you economics skills but something different, did they considered paying you some more money, perhaps as a side-stipends for actually contributing economically where they could have otherwise paid heavy money to employ an economist?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The Government only pays based on position and not what you do in that position. They also do not value specialist skills.
Exactly what I thought, but that's saddening, although I guess you did your part when you worked for them.