I only just saw your reply here because you are auto muted in peakd and I don't get notifications when you reply.

That there is putting together two very non intertwined futures and for what reason would you make that statement other than to attempt to have the reader believe the two are somehow on a destined path.

The only way that Hive is not part of humanity's future is if Hive either already doesn't exist or is soon to die. In my view, neither of those are true - yet you think differently and that's fine. I find it a bit odd that you are here wasting your own time to comment on something that you think is going to die soon anyway, but each to their own.

you continued on the Hive evangelist route like somehow fixing Hive is destined to save humanity.

There can never be any technology that can save humanity because the roots of our problems are internal imbalances within each individual. I have written multiple essays on this topic in the past. However, since I am unaware of any established project that actually protects free speech online better than Hive, I include it as a useful tool to help us communicate as we evolve.

Which technology do you think will 'save free speech'? Or do you take the view that we can never have free speech?