So many tropes in that video and everything in there is completely taken out of context. These are medical professionals that don't understand potential side effects. Is it just the US government or all governments that are hiding all the information?? Project Veritas hasn't been caught on anything else misleading, have they - good grief.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Did you watch the video? When you give a healthy 30 year old an injection that causes him heart problems great enough to force you to transfer him to a hospital that can treat his new congestive heart failure...is this an embellishment?
When a healthy 15 year old boy begins throwing clots immediately after taking this vaccine, how is this a metaphor?
Please explain how it is figurative, when a seasoned RN with a Masters degree and years of supervisors experience can barely avoid crying over the loss of a good friend two days after that friend was inoculated?
When a doctor claims there is "too much shit" in this vaccine, and she is Not Allowed to report adverse effects on this experimental vaccination. How is this changed from it's original signification? What is the proper signification of "too much shit"; and not allowed to report, that everyone else is missing?
Not related directly to this video, but when the researcher who developed this RNA vaccine for a research tool to use on lab animals, and told us it was never intended to be used for a mass vaccine; this was trope too?
Big words are fun, especially when used properly....
🤬🤬🤬What tropes exactly? Have you looked at the scientific/medical studies on myocarditis? VAERS reports? Real life stories? Rates are high, right in line with the testimony of the nurse. Side effects are definitely being suppressed, when myocarditis is called "mild" when no such thing as a mild case of myocarditis exists, it's like saying a 'mild' heart attack. Plus it has 25-50% long-term mortality rate, also according to peer-reviewed scientific studies, not whistleblower nurses. Are the studies all tropes too?
Much evidence backing up what I say can be found here, if you’d like to review the primary sources of evidence for yourself, it proves that adverse events are being suppressed and lied about, and that wouldn’t change without these nurses/doctors testimony, which only further supports the growing body of evidence indicting this ‘vaccine’ as the most dangerous in all of vaccine history, by far:
https://peakd.com/hive-122315/@jasonliberty/crime-against-humanity-suppressed-vaccine-harms-a-deadly-injection-and-the-criminal-nature-of-every-aspect-of-this-entire-coe
I don’t suggest being so quick to discount the nurses' testimony just because she's on project veritas, especially when it's in line with all the medical studies, VAERS reports, personal accounts, and previous evidence that adverse effects are indeed being underreported. It's recorded and we can hear exactly what she's saying, I'm not sure how it could be taken out of context or made irrelevant based on past behaviors of Project Veritas, such as selective editing.