You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Bye Twitter! Twitter Locks My Account For Posting A Hive Graphene Oxide Vaccine Post (@richq11)

in Informationwar3 years ago

It sucks that you got booted from Twitter... but there's no graphene oxide in the pfizer or Moderna vaccines. They both use lipid nanoparticles. Suprised you are not screaming about the Chinese vaccine with the aluminium hydroxide adjuvant.

Sort:  

Aluminium hydroxide adjuvant/boosters is/are Prior Art and known since many years. Surprised you are not backing up your:...but there's no graphene oxide in the pfizer or Moderna vaccines..

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=71587

Suspicions of the two researchers turned out to be true. There is almost NO biological matter in the Pfizer covid-19 vial. What the lab in the University of Almeria found has nothing to do with mRNA.
The main matter found was a substance more alike to nanoparticles of graphene or a very similar nanomaterial. Extraction and quantification of mRNA in the sample, identified that 99% of the whole substance inside the vial was highly probably graphene oxide or something very similar, just very little genetic material was found. Until now, no lipid nanocapsules were identified.
The study mentions that there is a reduced form of graphene oxide (GO.) When graphene oxide is mixed with hydrogen it becomes MAGNETIC (MGO.) It is also known as reduced graphene oxide (this happens when it is injected blood too.)
Graphene oxide layers from scientific literature and from a commercial graphene oxide sample compared against the microscopy performed on the Pfizer sample show identical patterns in both electron and optical microscopy, leaving doubt we’re talking about the same material.
The study offers solid evidence of possible graphene derivatives because the structure saw in the microscopy is characteristic. Academics who previously worked with graphene oxide were consulted and agreed there is no doubt about the presence of graphene oxide in the vial.
The study required by Biostatistician Ricardo Delgado contrasts a graphene oxide sample bought in the market against covid-19 Pfizer mRNA Comirnaty [ commercial name of the Pfizer/BioNTech product “vaccine.”]
This preliminary study includes optical and electron microscopy conducted by Prof. Dr. Pablo Campra team director in charge. Digital signature here.
It has been only one brand jab but more tests are needed to be done with other vials. More studies are to come with some other different technics. La Quinta Columna makes a call to other institutes and universities to join this research crusade for the truth.

You trust the mainstream corporate fact-checkers? I don't.

Word, me neither😉

But you trust one source (it is one source). All of the different sites that support the Graphene Oxide narrative are regurgitating the same study. The University even states the information represented is false.

Well no, I don't. I'm not taking a side on that. I just really don't trust mainstream "fact checkers" anymore. There was a time that Snopes (for example) was legit, but not nowadays. I think we should go as close to the source of the data or information as possible, to get to the truth. Easier said than done sometimes..

Do you need more??
From Forbes,Reuters,Twitter & bought "Fact" checkers...!??😂
No thanks.
Ok, let's be honest.
Unless no one of us tests the vaccinated or the Covid19 vaccines,
anybody can "fake" anything.
But! The patents are reality & pending... i will post/reblog more
about them. No discussion there.
You wanna call a patent misinformation!?
Do you think those patents are "coincidence" @verite ?😏
I think you play yourself big time with the sources you mention
here...Forbes,Reuters,Twitter & bought "Fact" checkers...😅