"What are the implications of this?"
It's irrelevant. Just more AI fake news.
"...NASA disclosures are a hoax."
Couldn't have said it better myself. It is blatantly obvious, as many have pointed out to me, that NASA has been faking pics and video since the 1960s. Now, I don't have any basis to claim that those fake pics prove the moon landing didn't happen, or that NASA doesn't have tech, like flying saucers, they are keeping secret from us. I know people exist and advance tech, so flying saucers isn't proof of ayliums either. It's only proof NASA lies and deceives us. You make that point yourself.
Yet you draw insuperable conclusions from what is known, the deception, to motivations for it, which is ayliums. This is not rational and rigorous. It is weak and prone to deception, which we already know is being attempted. I grew up watching the moon landings on TV, and was indoctrinated to believe what we were watching was real. Because it was necessary to reject my false beliefs when confronted with proof I had been deceived, I learned I must be careful about what I believe. That experience was exacerbated by continuous examples of official fake news, Watergate, Iran/Contra, OK City, Randy Weaver, chemtrails, anthropogenic CO2 caused global warming, 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Iran, and Palestine, over and over, Palestine, Russia, Russia, Russia, and Trump is not the swamp. I have become automatically suspicious that when I am provided an official story that it is false, and I cannot recall one time that automatic assumption has been disproved. Official propaganda is always false.
I still check, because being wrong has been very painful to me, and I do my best to confirm what I suspect before I believe it. What irrefutable evidence is there that there are ayliums that have come to Earth? I have not seen one scrap of actual evidence, and I have seen voluminous fake news making that claim, which is now being exacerbated by the official story being that ayliums are real. IME that means that ayliums will almost certainly be proved to be fake news.
UFO sightings in the shape of saucers or any other shape are obviously able to be explained as secret tech made by people. So, what hard evidence can you provide of ayliums? There are many supporting lines of evidence against ayliums, but none of them are probative, so I do not assert I believe there are NOT ayliums. However, the preponderance of evidence strongly counters the many disproved claims there are ayliums, such as Lew Elizondo having been proved a liar. That makes every claim he has ever made dubious, because one claim he made was a deliberate falsehood. There is a lot of this kind of deception in the disclosure crowd, over and over, from fake aylium mummies in Mexico to fake video of helicopters retrieving aylium eggs, and EVERYTHING the government claims is always a lie, so good luck trying to claim anything the government says is evidentiary in any way (except when it turns out to be provably false, and is more evidence the government is lying, that is).
Thanks!
Ummm, i tried hard to leave ayliums out of this blog, and use a ubiquitous "flying saucer" instead of UFO or such.
Did i fail?
I could discuss all kinds of that, but this was just about the mental breaks we will see when disclosure gets past the breaking points, and what that might mean
Your reply is upvoted by @topcomment; a manual curation service that rewards meaningful and engaging comments.
More Info - Support us! - Reports - Discord Channel