The other day, on Twitter X this image resurfaced:
From this, one would obviously think that nuclear energy is the best.
But, this graphic only shows one of the few metrics where nuclear energy wins.
I really dislike these one sided comparisons. They are VERY underhanded.
This would be a bit better:
But it really doesn't say how bad nuclear energy is because we currently do not measure anything in what is currently called pseudo-science. And it is called psuedo-science because modern scientists are ignoring it. However, it is what makes nuclear energy the most dangerous.
What Makes Nuclear Energy Dangerous?
For this we must go to well known and well cateloged anecdotal data.
Contractors who work around radiation.
These contractors work a few days on, and many days off.
And even with many days off, 50% of the work force calls in sick.
Not sick from any cold or flu, but feeling dead, like the life has been sucked out of them.
The air around the radiation does not set off the rad counter, but it sucks the water out of the skin and worse. It causes skin flaking / peeling off, in chunks. It shuts down internal organs and lowers immunity.
And this is talking about the current batch of people working with the most modern gear.
Because current science believes that radiation damage is just large particles flying out and damaging cells, it is impossible to accurately diagnose and fix this.
What Psychics See
People who can see auras, talk about what they see around nuclear reactors.
They all, every one of them, talk about a swirling whirlpool of darkness.
Definitely not the kind of thing you want to be around.
And this is outside of the shields / concrete dome.
So, from this perspective, the shields / dome is not blocking out what this nuclear pile is putting out.
But, again, since we label these people as freaks, often as frauds, science ignores this input.
And so, they have never developed a safe reactor.
Like the Nuke Plant in the Simpsons, the shielding on the back is just a screen door.
Uranium is rare
Even in places where there is a large density of radioactive materials, millions of tons of earth have to be moved to get a tiny amount of material.
Ranger Uranium Open Pit Mine
After the material is mined, it has to be crushed up (as in, much of it gets into the air) and have the material they want leached out. Then it has to be processed. The surrounding area is poisoned. The leaching pools are out in the open. It is a huge mess.
Then, after all that, the uranium has to be enriched... another process, in another plant (a relic of WWII that they keep using because making a new one would mean cleaning up the old one.)
Coal mining, which is known as dirty, is far cleaner today that mining for uranium.
Nuclear Energy Is Dangerous
The mining for nuclear material is dangerous
The using of nuclear material to make steam is dangerous
The storage of nuclear waste is dangerous.
It is the largest, most expensive, most dangerous way to boil water.
Why does anyone push anything that is so dangerous? Probably because they want to see the planet irradiated (maybe their alien overlords like more radiation in the atmosphere?) Or maybe they are just completely ignorant of what is really happening?
The only thing good about nuclear energy is its long lifespan, mine it once, use it for years.
However, if we worked on geothermal, wave energy, magnetic motors or real solar, the lifespan would be far greater, and we do not have to destroy ourselves and the environment.
Further, we are wasting out nuclear material. If physics wasn't so backwards, we would understand that radioactive material can be used to move things. Yes, just move them. Like putting a wheel in the way of a focussed output of a nuclear pellet can cause it to spin. Why burn the stuff up? Maybe their is a group that doesn't want us to have nice things.
other images from twitter and wiki
nuclear energy is bad MHKKAAYY ?
magnet motors are CONSPIRACY THEORY, MHHKAAY ?
But i've seen the magnetic mothers!
They're still a conspiracy theory, MMMKAY?!
Not trying to start a fight with you or anything but in your opinion what is the type of energy that should be used?
Geothermal - Drill a deep well. Use a refrigerant that boils at low temperatures but above ambient air temperature. Run a small turbine like Tesla Turbine. And you will power a small community till everything wears out. Or you can even go with a sterling engine. With a 50° difference you can get a house's electric worth.
(these have been blocked from anyone without govern-cement approval even researching it)
Wave - Basically build a giant paddlewheel, size of a Ferris wheel. And you have power with every wave that crashes to the shore.
(these have been blocked by all the "green peace" protesters cause they will look bad.)
Magnetic Motor - Yes these exist, but need some big money engineering put into them. They spin, but not enough torque to power a typical genset.
(people say that perpetual motion machines don't exist)
Real Solar - photovoltaic panels are really easy. Just plug them together and they go, but they are not very efficient. And quite expensive. We can use much cheaper mirrors and metal pipe and power a sterling engine or a turbine or a piston steam engine.
(every time The US funds one of these ever 20 years, and then pulls the plug just before it starts producing)
Perhaps you know something about this sort of energy I read about involving waterways as a source of renewable energy. The difference between it and solar or wind was that when the supply exceeds the demand there was no need for batteries because the system would automatically move the massive amount of water back up to the top of whatever collector they were using should there be no demand for the energy at the time.
Is this ringing any bells for you? You seem a great deal better-informed than I do on this topic so I am hoping you can help me out here.
Yep, one of my first blogs on this. I do not know why Komifornia isn't all over this.
It is like the people in charge aren't even trying... or maybe they are trying, to make sure that no one actually does anything real and good for humanity.
Congratulations @builderofcastles! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Check out our last posts:
Unfortunately, neither side in this argument is being truthful.
Radiation is dangerous. Too much of it can hurt very badly.
Most people do not get headaches from their WIFI router.
Some people get headaches from having their cellular phone too close to their head.
Being around the bigger transceivers can be quite debilitating.
A little bit of uranium... or uranium enriched soil has been known to heal. (use as a last resort)
(but there are many medical treatments in this category)
X-ray machines can damage you.
The piece of radioactive material inside it can cause death with too much exposure.
It is easy to get too much radioactive material to melt down with a chain reaction.
Spent uranium bullets used in Iraq war are still causing birth defects.
And the stuff that i am talking about, the black swirling vortext is real, and not even considered as part of the problems of nuclear power.
So, no, things are not all rosy in the LENR camp.