You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Proposal: reduce Hive inflation by reducing curation rewards

I think you're suggesting "anonymous" downvotes. Most everyone agrees it would be an improvement, but its not easy to figure out how to do it. But it's something I'm going to think about after the HF, and see if there's a solution.

Sort:  

not necessarily anon downvotes all though that would be cool but i meant just not related to a users hive power so that its more of a fair game. People don't come here because person x or y doesn't like them and they have more power than them. Beef starts pettyness etc etc its toxic for a platform like this.

Do you mean that all hive users would have equal downvote weight? If so, there's a problem with this. It's called a sybil attack. The problem is that one person can easily create many accounts, then vote with all those accounts, magnifying his power. To avoid such attacks, Hive relies on stake-weighted voting, where people at least have to pay for their voting power, instead of just gaming a signup system.

It is worth pointing out that a properly designed reputation system might enable a more democratic system. But this is a topic for a much later date.