You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SportsTalkSocial community: Overview

in Sports Talk Social2 years ago (edited)

I'm still working to move the keys for those accounts to a multisig quorum for control of @sports-gov which controls @hive-101690 and @sportsnft. @sportstalksocial was removed from community control to serve as an announcements portal for the sportstalksocial.com website and to do community content. https://www.sportstalksocial.com/@patrickulrich/sports-governance-proposal-sports-account-and-distribution-changes I guess you could say I'm still owner at this point based on those points but the goal will be to make sure I am not as soon as I can be confident that the accounts won't be locked in the multisig. I should have already completed that but just haven't got the chance.

https://github.com/hive-engine/outpost is the repository for the outpost sites. As for BTC I would assume that's funds from a-ads.com and probably comingled funds they use. They had automated payouts into the SWAP.BTC address for the funds that are in sports-gov.

Actifit gave us a much larger token distribution for the first few years than we would have achieved on our own. That creates its own issues as you point out but if those users don't want change then forcing it on them isn't the solution either. I'm just speaking from experience when it comes to limiting partnerships with Actifit that stakeholders were not for it when I've opened discussion in the past. Maybe they would see things differently now.

If stakeholders voted a proposal that said to wipe away everything and just have a core team with the rights to influence however they liked then I would think that's fair game to do. I'd be happy to transfer the domain sportstalksocial.com to that team as well if the community wanted someone else to control the project's host domain name. I think if the community votes for it then that's what we should do.

Sort:  

https://github.com/hive-engine/outpost is the repository for the outpost sites. As for BTC I would assume that's funds from a-ads.com and probably comingled funds they use. They had automated payouts into the SWAP.BTC address for the funds that are in sports-gov.

I will try to take some time to look the code and figure out if it is possible to implement some ads without Hive Engine dependency. If no possible, I will try to talk with Hive Engine to understand if they want to return to implement the previous advertising functionality.

Actifit gave us a much larger token distribution for the first few years than we would have achieved on our own. That creates its own issues as you point out but if those users don't want change then forcing it on them isn't the solution either. I'm just speaking from experience when it comes to limiting partnerships with Actifit that stakeholders were not for it when I've opened discussion in the past. Maybe they would see things differently now.

I really don’t know if it was a good move to distribute tokens to Actifit, but I am not here to talk about past, since we cannot change past.
I want to help to move forward and improve things in the future.

If stakeholders voted a proposal that said to wipe away everything and just have a core team with the rights to influence however they liked then I would think that's fair game to do. I'd be happy to transfer the domain sportstalksocial.com to that team as well if the community wanted someone else to control the project's host domain name. I think if the community votes for it then that's what we should do.

Are you saying if the community approves a proposal to have a core team, you will transfer everything (all private keys and hosting) to the core team in the current state they are in?

That's awesome! If you think you can get it working I'd want to point the domain to a server that was running your condenser code instead of the HE one. Like I said I think there's an opportunity to offer advertising to more tribes than just SPORTS. I think if someone created that code and ran an advertising service they could bring a lot of help to tribes and even use the advertising revenue to support better hosting than HE provides so tribes win twice.

Definitely. I'd want to follow our existing policy of using the ARCHON governance system for that kind of vote but if the tribe preferred a centralized team to handle things then who would I be to stand in front of their will? The whole point of this token is to create a community around sporting content on Hive. If the community wants something then that's what we are here to deliver on.