You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: [공지] @proxy.token 증인 투표 운영 방침(@proxy.token witness voting policy)

in SCT.암호화폐.Crypto5 years ago (edited)

And yet there are people who liked these changes.

How many people liked the idea of the chain being destroyed?

Maybe there should finally be some debate? Unless there's always a "master" ruling the "plebs" and it's not worth talking about.

Look, if Steem were to be dismantled and the code ported to the Tron blockchain as a set of smart contracts, then none of use would have any power over anything. Because the Tron foundation has complete control over Tron blockchain, we'd be at the complete mercy of Justin Sun. That if anything is master ruling over plebs if anything. Is that what you really want? Because that's what you get if you stab the community in the back by voting for Justin Sun who is trying to turn Steem into a centralized network.

Sort:  

DPoS was chose because of its better scalability.

But I think you have a better chance of getting more people on board with your initiative to increase decentralization now.

Steem is not going to adopt PoS. That's not what I meant. I meant the other measures you suggested.

I think a bridge to do two-way swaps between the chains would be a good thing. Any two chains should be able to connect that way.