@themarkymark, I've worked telephone jobs where I've communicated with over 100 people in a day. Four minute phone calls or less. If I divide 44,561 people by 100 in a day that's is 446 days of work. I've never tried to assess if they are good people or bad people. All of that said, how long does it take to determine the guilt of 44,561 people? It seems like a very long list of guilty people on a platform of so few users? I'm not suggesting that you got it wrong all of the time, but is it possible you got it wrong some of the time? Is it possible that some of these people, and we all hear them squealing like a pig, are getting mistreated? The spam on your comments seems to indicate that some are not feeling your method of #CancellationCulture. Now, I don't know you too well, and I'm not sure how awesome you are at cancelling the right people, but your stats are very high. So you're either doing something really really right, or you're trying to get that sweet SPS which is fine if you're doing right, but not fine if you're padding the numbers. How long does it take to determine to say that so-and-so Steemian is guilty of shitposts? Does one shit post end them permanently, or does it take several? I'm just interested in your #CancelationCultureMethodology?
How many active users are there?
When did you start your list of 44.5k?
How long did it take?
Does your list of 44.5k matter less if there
are not that many active users today?
Answer or don't, it's cool either way, I just
figured I had to field those questions your way.
No idea, my guess is 8k-20k
I've been working on the blacklist for over 2 years.
43k accounts not 43k users. Many are farm networks with 200-500+ accounts. Many are not active anymore but I can't possibly track which ones are using any more and worry about them coming back to spam and plagiarize again.
I just hope that innocent people aren't getting gummed up in the works. I can understand if they are posting spam in the sense that it's the exact same message over and over again. Or if they are posting illegal porn or something to that effect. Those reasons are perfectly acceptable in my book. Where I take issue is the "shitposting," and revenge permadownvotes, it's such a gray area and could easily turn into the ugly things we see today on YouTube and all the other stupid places that I left to come here for. If there are only 8-to-20k active users from that list now it might be nice to know how many active abusers we currently have on steem?
This way we can sort through those accounts and just make sure they deserve to be on the list. This is in the bit of the realm of philosophical, and I don't know if you would agree or not but the English jurist William Blackstone in his seminal work, 'Commentaries on the laws of England' suggested that "it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer". I'm not sure the moral relevance behind the statement or if it should be a maxim of law but it's something to ponder in a position of great power like yourself. You are creating a lot of untermensch with your list, so it's best it be more accurate than not, else innocents will suffer.
Innocent people are not getting gummed in the works. They are all added manually by me.
I used to real a lot of @nanocheeze's work because it' pertains to a similar interest I have in the theory of many worlds or the quantum theory of reality. That is to say that some people believe there many universes, even DWAVE proponents suggest this is true and that we are borrowing qubits from different dimensions. It's some real either sciencey stuff. Anywho, I noticed that you unpersoned them and it hurts me because I didn't even notice this stuff happen in real time. I make so many friends here it's hard to keep track of all of them. Can I ask what they did wrong to get unpersoned?
He is not on my blacklsit. He is on SteemStem's blacklist.
It appears you invisalined their
last eight posts into oblivion.
I'd like to read their posts and did read their posts too from time to time. When I have to click [show] and then [show] again to see their images it pisses me off. Is SteemStem also you, because you are the highest downvoter which invisalined their posts?
I did flag him, but I am not SteemStem.