Sort:  

EVERY SINGLE ONE. is that clear enough? sorry if i don't think comparing the prince of peace with a self avowed child rapist and mass murdering warlord is is an accurate one. good day!

I can give u verses In ur own bible where aparantly jesus says rape a women and then marry them. He also says kill the women and children so don't just tell us where he says. Love ur enemy.

No you can't give us such verses.
Jesus said no such things.
Think about it a minute.
If your teachers are telling you such things
How can you trust them to teach you anything?

if you can do so then do. i've read the bible 11 times. the old testament has some gruesome crap in it. i'm pretty sure i never ran across jesus saying rape women and kill children. so, tell me, where? i'm waiting. listen, it sounds like you are angry. the bible is the most printed book in the world. if you can find 1 copy that says what you say, that you didn't make up, i will apologize. ready, set, go. the koran on the other hand, well, go ahead and read it again. you have read it, right? u kan sortof spell wurds so i asume u kan reed rite?

The problem is due to willing ignorance of the biblical scriptures.

In the situation(s) you refer to there were specific reasons that God gave the commands He did, and they were one time commands for each instance. For example, there were people that made stone statues and heated them to high temperatures and then burned their children alive on them to their "gods" a sacrifices.

Another misunderstanding, due to willing ignorance, is the penalties for sins. In many cases the penalty given is death. What needs to be understood is that these were the maximum sentences allowed and not mandatory sentences. Look at most existing legal systems - the judge determines the amount of penalty after the trial, and it is rarely ever the maximum allowed by law. Jesus gave us a good example of this. The woman that was caught in adultery was not stoned to death, but warned to discontinue her sin.

I find it interesting that when a Christian does something wrong that other Christians publicly condemn the act. When Muslims do something wrong other Muslims are silent. If a Christian shares their beliefs with another person and the other person rejects what they are saying they go their separate ways. If a Muslim shares the Quran with another person and they reject it he can kill him.

My scriptures tell me that Satan came to steal, kill and destroy. I don't see a personal God of love in the Quran, I see Satan.

still waiting.

I will look into what Jesus P.B.U.Him allegedly said, with all due respect we don't believe everthing in the bible to be the exact words of jesus himself, but of what mark, Mathew John and luke, Paul, say what they think JEUSU said, and most of they saying contradicts each other.

you will find no contradiction that has anything to do with jesus saying kill or rape anyone. keep making up stuff. i can do this all day. i'd rather see christianity in charge of the whole earth than see islam in charge of a can opener.

Loading...

funny how it seems you can type but you can't read.

I did not type that I copy and paste
That is what the bible teaches no different to what u claim ISIS is doing right know

Did Jesus P.B.U.him say I have not come to change the laws of Moses P.B.U.Them. But to up hold them so it makes no difference if he said it or Moses said it. Since he agrees with it, since it makes no diffrence to me what Islam teaches. I am 100% behind Quran. and Who ever thinks prophet Muhammad P.B.U.Him is a tarriest and all the names they attach to him and Islam, I say so I'm I.

then i guess there is no point. i was just doing this for fun. i told you i'm not a christian, but i'd rather be a dingleberry on a diseased yak than be a muslim

he said, "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil." fulfilling the prophesy of the coming of the new covenant is not condoning under the new covenant what was done in the old. it is only not condemning it. he did not come to condemn what was done in the past but to give salvation to the future. that is the doctrine. he was trying to walk a line so the people he was speaking to wouldn't kill him for blasphemy then and there.

What I said and what u said is the same thing. The only difference is u say he came with a new covenant which is not true he did not come with nothing new. watch this

I am not telling you to be a Muslim and even if you wanted to be a Muslim you would not be able to be one. as God chooses who he guides and who he misguide. did u chose to be a male/female or did God chose it for you?

now we're on the road to froot loop logic. what you just said makes no sense at all, even in the self referencing, circular logic of religion. try again and this time with more feeling.