George Washington was a spymaster, hemp production generates too much local wealth... in this edition of HIGH LEVEL INSIDER AMA PART 9: 7/12/16 (2)

Carrying on with the transcription of HLI 4chan discussions... in this edition:

-the market is systemically broken
-George Washington should be praised for even more than he generally is, including being an adept spymaster
-no one is aware of themselves
-25% per capita GDP growth is possible and sustainable with Three's plan
-hemp's production/use suppression is due to our regime's disdain of local wealth generation
-cancer curing should be probably allowed so that we can then down regulate stem cells for anti-aging measures
-don't join the Masons for god's sake
-what would you do if you had absolute power? (politically)

7.12.2016 (2)

HLI: Question Session Open

/pol/: What's the deal with paradoxes?

HLI: They are generated by bad assumptions.

/pol/: So you're saying paradoxes can be resolved if the underlying assumptions are corrected?

HLI: Yes

/pol/: Are we meant to, or capable of, exploring and colonizing the cosmos?

HLI: We are capable and supportive of this.

/pol/: What are your thoughts on the Cern super colider being used to open different dimensions ?

HLI: Fantasies of speculation.

/pol/: Does the human brain contain all knowledge already? Is it up to the individual to unlock these things?

HLI: No. There isn't a cheat code to life.

/pol/: How far is the NSA/DoD/(((they))) from total machination of the military system? Also in case of a civil war would the country have a way to mind control or force the soldiers to enforce orders they personally do not agree with?

HLI: We don't assess this as a viable threat.

You need a number of robots on the scale of the number of people you want to go after, otherwise there is a lag time between initiation and completion that permits responses, never mind the inability to deal with whatever dead man's hands might be left behind.

/pol/: I've been thinking about how people could all be individually sovereign and independent we could either completely modify our energy input... like run our bodies on a different source. Look at how much energy goes into food production, and most of that is to satiate our endless desires for novelty. If we could find a way to sustain our lives without a need for the system...? What? A few thousand watts of solar panels at about $1/watt off ebay, $500 of golf cart batteries, an inverter, a reverse osmosis water purifier and requisite source, computer with internet connection for access to the world's knowledge, a shed full of tools; the hardest thing now is food. With automated farming, could one have a nice automated greenhouse? Coupled with a diet based on biological needs. Hunting rifle for game, rod/nets for fishing. Can't support many people with hunting, though. Humanity went through that before the neolithic age. Can we go back to a simpler life but now with technology?

HLI: You need to increase energy throughput per capita. Efficiency gains are slow and hard work compared to scaling up.

/pol/: Well, considering greed will never be removed from financial systems, why not take advantage of it to promote energy innovation in storage and production?

If we can make energy=potential wealth, greed will demand the most profitable energy sector become prevalent.

Example: fraccing was extremely profitable at $100 a barrel. This spawned an expansion in petrochemical technology and innovation. Then the price dropped, it became too expensive, and now investers are looking for the next gravy train.

Eventually, the overall energy production will increase BECAUSE of greed.

We have a glut of oil, coal, and natural gas. The next profitable sector either needs to be deregulated (nuclear) or invented (fusion.)

Thoughts.

HLI: Energy production increases, especially in per capita terms, is not guaranteed by any means.

In the USA, the long trend of increase reversed at about the same time the middle class started falling apart - circa 1970.

/pol/: I noticed you focused on cancer itself instead of aging.

Is that because of the way aging is cured? Seems like something that has such a profound affect on telomeres might cause higher instances of cancer.

Related.

http://bioviva-science.com/2016/04/21/first-gene-therapy-successful-against-human-aging/

HLI: Yes. Aging is primarily characterized by down regulation of stem cells, accumulation of waste, and increasing malfunctioning. You can largely address the first problem if you allow curing cancer (you can reverse the down regulation of your stem cells with little remaining adverse consequence).

/pol/: You said yesterday Hillary issued the bonds in 1991 , all I can come up with is it was bush responsible for issuing the bonds. How could she or even bill be in a position to issue the bonds?

HLI: Bush and Clinton families are essentially indistinguishable in terms of agenda and worked together on these projects.

/pol/: Why is hemp not being widely used? The potentials are huge.

Ford's first car was made from hemp, and designed to run on hemp ethanol.
Hemp-made houses are fire, mold, and pest proof.
Hemp restores life to barren soil.
Weed is literally the holy spirit, in the holy oil, it was grown by the ancient israelites, used by David and Solomon, Jesus, etc.

Why is this being surpressed? It is literally the plant with the greatest utility for human kind.

HLI: Your regime doesn't like local wealth generation.

/pol/: The only things that are allowed into your experience are that which you bring?

The killer and killed are both complicit. Yes? I do think this way.

Are there real individuals?

We are thoughts in a mind looking at itself projecting into the physical?

I have wanted to join different societies (Masonic) simply so I can read their literature. Is there a fatal risk to this or should I obtain said materials by other means?

How much time do you spend alone or visualizing?

Are memories genetic?

HLI: You run the risk of being killed unless you can protect yourself, yes. You will be asked to swear under penalty of death not to divulge secrets.

/pol/: >We have an energy crisis, but also ways out.

Is "fossil fuels" a misnomer?

Abiogensis as a result of not yet understood (by the general public) bio/geochemical processes deeper down?

HLI: Both processes are real.

/pol/: Whats inside the black cube in Mecca?

HLI: Rejection

/pol/: How much more energy could we produce if we didn't have distractions like social media? Are these distractions creating a net drain that has to be plugged with money printing etc?

HLI: We don't see any practical limit and assess 25% year over year increases are sustainable for decades at least.

/pol/: How did we pull ourselves up from beasts once again?

If we fell in the first place due to hedonistic personalities, do we know how it descended?

HLI: Become a builder of a better version of yourself.

/pol/: What is one thing that every person in your threads has been unaware of?

HLI: Themselves

/pol/: Well, yes, but that's not representative of the system I'm advocating.

You said already, that power is no longer constrained to the amount of humans.

Turning energy into wealth in the minds of the top earners could have a profound Shockwave effect on our economic system.

I'm not saying there won't be crises, I'm saying that an energy based system would more accurately reflect the potential of a nation to produce.

Example: financial institutions are representing larger and larger portions of GDP, while being exposed to legal, yet self destructive banking practices. They don't accurately reflect potential for work in cases of widespread corruption.

HLI: We concur. The market is systemically broken. Basic functionality like price signals is essentially gone. Wealth is arbitrarily manipulated and not representative of tangible production (not just of goods, but purposeful services too)

/pol/: What is you or your group's opinion on George Washington as a national leader?

HLI: The high praise he generally receives is an understatement of actual accomplishment.

/pol/: Was the plan to destroy all the evidence the way it was in place from the begining or was it planned later if so what year?

What dates where the bonds issued?

HLI: From the beginning. 9/11/91 to 9/14/91.

/pol/: What do you think how people will call our epoch? I can see clear connections to the Biedermeier time in Europe where the middle class turned away from politic involvment concentrating on art. Nowadays i see people highly uninterested in poltics because they feel powerless and cant change the establishment and instead of change they consume not art anymore but eveything what distracts them from what is happening. Do we live in some kind of a Neo-Biedermeier epoch? maybe combinded with post modern depression?

HLI: One of the biggest problems is the failure to imagine change. It's also tractable in the sense that once you start a process of expanding minds and senses of possibility this can take on a life of its own and rapidly expand throughout the population.

/pol/: Ok, so what does that leave us with? I tend to think that you mean that on the macro scale we need more energy.
Oil & Fossil Fuels > no for obvious reasons, may be necessary for air/space travel for a while yet.
Nuclear (fission) > requires massive scale and biggest problems are the actual amount of uranium on earth and disposal of waste with destructive potential for 10k year scales.
Nuclear (fusion) > not yet feasible.
Wind > can't replace baseload power generation, can change weather, not feasible on large scale.
Solar > still not very efficient, but much improved. Biggest problem is that all solar cells are made from silicon wafers just like cpus, this takes tons of energy and requires massive economy of scale to barely break even. Can't replace baseload power.

Now here's where it gets a bit tinfoil-hatty:
Have you heard of M.T. Keshe? Iranian scientist who has released designs for zero-point energy generation for free. Without further investigation it seems like this is the tech that Tesla had or wanted to develop but was prevented. Is it really just there in the ether waiting for us to tap?

HLI: You shouldn't hold your breath waiting on a violation of the laws o thermodynamics.

/pol/: Do you have any questions you wanna ask us? I mean, obviously you know a fuckin' lot, but I'm certain there's some sort of armor-piercing, soul-crushing question you'd like to throw to us.

HLI: Sometimes when I hear people complain about the world, I ask them if I could give you absolute power (in the sense of policy and things like this, not turn gravity off) what would you change?

The response has always been stuttering.

/pol/: What can we do to replace the dopamine hit people get from social media with something more productive?

HLI: Appeal to their reward system in another way. I've pointed this out before, that the appropriate path to "red pilling" someone isn't just trying to prove that what exists is bad, but showing the gap between what could be and what is. People react with revulsion and motivation to the feeling of being cheated.

/pol/: Another question while I'm at it as opposed to the one I just asked in the thread separately, but what are some accomplishments of Washington we don't really know about?

HLI: Highly adept spymaster and manipulator of the mystery of schools, an ability that was indispensable to the viability of the revolution.