Obviously, does that change the fact that people who vote (not bots) vote for what they think is best?

The problem arises when you vote for something because it pays off for you. For example, you vote for your posts or you vote for each other with a colleague to maximize your profits.

This is harmful to the platform. It promotes behaviour that destroys the network.

Yes I have, I could have given it to myself. You avoided the pertinent point also, yet again. The point is if it's not my money, who's money is it?

They're part of everyone. The resources that you give to people by upvote do not exist. However, they have one fundamental point. They lower the value of all other tokens. Logical.

The whole problem is that with connection 1 - you are handing out tokens that aren't your people you don't know. But at the same time you can do everything to earn as much as you can.

Something that in the donate system is not possible to fulfill, here is implemented on a large scale.

The money is mine, by virtue of my stake, like any stakeholder has rights to the revenue of their stake.

These tokens (what you are giving away) do not exist. They do not exist until payout, in principle. But let's assume a different situation, they do exist, but they belong to all the people at once.

It's also a problem, if you don't use tokens (don't give them away), someone else will. They don't disappear.

The problem is, you can't say - it's my money. Because they never were.

You give it away as you please. You can give it to the worst post - e.g. child pornography, because you don't lose anything.

However, if you give a donate, you lose money. You choose only the best entries.