The subsidy system as in ZapRead is even better in many ways. This is due to the fact that by voting for the content you vote only for the best (in your opinion).

Exactly how voting works anywhere: you vote for what you think is the best, in your opinion. So what's the difference lol..

The Steem system is the worst in economic terms because you give money that is not yours to another person you probably don't know. (As in socialism).

The money is yours. You have a stake in the system that gives you the right to distribute according to your stake. Who's money is it if it's not yours. And what the heck are you talking about knowing or not the other person, you think that is relevant at all, wtf.

For example, I like BernieSanders, but I wouldn't give him a grant probably. But I don't pay anything for Steem, so I could give it to him for nothing.

For nothing? Yes because your steem did not cost anything correctly, it was given freely to you, without ANY effort on your part. Damn you're pulling at futile strings, first you tried to claim that transferring wealth, exactly how donation model works, is no different from staking wealth and distributing an inflatory pool of resources. You tried to argue that it's no different because you have to sell your steem for dollars, because that makes sense at all that it's the same as donating, now here you are trying to claim that the stakeholders don't have any right to distribute the wealth, because it's not theirs. Shit, you seemingly think that everyone is as retarded as you to try and assert some utter nonsense like that, after your previous idiotic remarks seeking to defend some oddity that has absolutely no chance in hell of surpassing steem, as is obviously evident by any cursory comparison of the userbase and subsequent success at their "endeavor" (more like a "pay us 10%, always, because).

As for Stake. In general, you freeze the funds in your account, but these funds were created from the air. In most cases you didn't pay for the tokens (but I can be wrong), like most of us. Stake is supposed to stop Steem from falling, but if the situation gets worse, people will evacuate and withdraw money from Stake, what's going on.

Yeah, your stake was handed out, like everyone else, without any effort on their part. What you are trying to say besides that idiocy of "funds were created from thin air" is that staking is not holding value, and thus is a poor mechanism to secure value, which is why donations/tips are so much better, or something, because I'm sure you had some point that tied back into the idiocy that transfer of wealth is no different than wealth rewarded by wealth staked directly to hold power over distribution of wealth to be rewarded.

Let me help you out:

When the mashed potatoes are passed around the table, they are distributed. When you take your mashed potatoes and give them to someone else you transfered your mashed potatoes.

I can only laugh at the thought that you might consider what you said as half intelligent / thoughtful but seriously, invest some time in improving your reasoning and critical thinking skill, it's deplorable.