Anyone who diligently uses the scientific method understands immediately that when someone's rebuttal to a long list of studies is to label them 'dogshit' and to belittle them without even a shred of counter evidence provided - then that someone in question is outside of integrity and balance. Throwing in casual ad hominem attack is another clue as to the lack of integrity present.

If you can demonstrate why the many studies published are 'not relevant' today then go ahead - but several of them are from 2013 and cellphone towers and phones have not undergone a significant enough transformation in that time for your claim here to be even vaguely true.

When you can respond here with substance we can discuss your claims. However, continued borderline trolling will result in you being muted, not because your position is so amazingly powerfully true, but because you are wasting everyone's time here with unsubstantiated claims that demonstrate ego imbalance that wants to compete instead of simply sharing understandings that can lead to co-creating beneficial outcomes for all involved.