I read your post - I don't have time for the 11min interview right now though! I will listen to it tomorrow! Do you have any studies saying that autism is linked to the vaccine (Please don't bring up the revoked one from A. Wakefield ;))
Did you read my post? I think it aims exactly at the problem described in your post!
What would you do in the little story I narrated?
There are studies linking autism to vaccines. There are many such studies. I'm not sure why you are asking.
Here are some if you needed some or doubted there was any. I'm not saying the conclusions of them are correct and I know some are only epidemiological studies but there are what you ask.
22 Medical Studies That Show Vaccines Can Cause Autism
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170
http://omsj.org/reports/tomljenovic%202011.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19740540A
I am not saying that there is absolutely no link. There may be, I don't know for sure. But neither do the experts of those studies.
@the first link:
https://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/09/17/another-weak-study-proves-vaccines-cause-autism/
https://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2010/09/16/autism-causation-and-the-hepatitis-b-vaccine-no-link/
http://www.harpocratesspeaks.com/2013/05/mind-institute-no-difference-in.html
@ your second link, even the paper itsself says: "Clearly, we cannot draw definite conclusions regarding the link be- tween Al adjuvants and autism based on an ecological study such as the present one and hence the validity of our results remains to be con- firmed."
The third link is not even working...
Vaccine court ruled in favor of link between MMR vaccine and autism in case of a Harvard Medical Dr. who's child became autistic as a result of the vaccine. This Dr. was involved in neuroscience and his child was involved in a study of his where brain imaging was involved prior to the receipt of the vaccine. So he was in a position that most other parents aren't as he had the before and after images of her brain to prove the damage.
Is followed by:
I didn't post these studies to prove anything. You asked for some studies and I provided some.
I'm not sure had read what followed what you had quote but the rest of the quote clearly state the concern of the researchers.
The lead researcher published quite a lot of studies since then. Yeah sure I don't doubt you can't find counter studies to her and that's okay.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lucija_Tomljenovic/publications
Thank you for taking the time to post these studies! I will read them!
Upvoted and followed!
It's great to see more French on Steemit! =)
I did read your post, and where you are wrong is in thinking that vaccine injury is rare. That is incredibly wrong! I have talked to countless people and heard so many stories of serious injury of many kinds.
I have studied each common vaccine and the risk vs reward, and in each case the risk was greater than the reward under normal circumstances.
Please read this article of mine:
Did Your Doctor Give You the Required Vaccine Packet Insert?
..
I have more to add to this ... but I am going out for a bit so will respond later.
..
I'm glad that you mentioned Dr. Wakefield, as I just read your other comment about him on your own article.
I do have sources other than just Dr. Wakefield...
BUT you really must look at this article of mine. What you have heard about him is simply wrong. I'm sure that you haven't actually read the study that he published. That study never did claim that the MMR causes Autism.
Some parents of autistic people had come to him and his colleagues asking for a study of the gastrointestinal issues that their children had. He was an esteemed gastroenterologist who had published many papers on Chrohn's disease, etc.
Dr. Andrew Wakefield a VILLAIN or a HERO? Here's what the Mainstream Media has left out ...
How am I wrong about the rate? Do you have scientific statistics that prove me wrong?
Where are your studies about the risk/reward ratio?
And Dr. Wakefield got his license and his publication taken away for good reasons - of course in his personal interviews he says something different ;)
I know that you will not like this post of mine. But I have to look at science and not just personal opinions or a few cases. Otherwise I also would have to say that smoking is no risk for lung cancer - because there are many smokers who never get it ;)
Thank you for posting this! I will read it!
Upvoted! =)