Thank you John. I enjoy that this is not turning into one of those distasteful conversations :)
Hippocrates was right. All of my immediate family are vegans now, so this is more than likely the main reason why they don't get sick.
Their stronger immune systems protect them better.
I wasn't 100% sure what Peer Review actually meant, so I checked it:
"Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal or as a book"
Three questions:
Big Pharma publicly funds the medical education system and gives financial incentives to doctors & hospitals who hand out their products, so how can these scholars provide objective viewpoints after going through the same indoctrination?
Who funds the specific research of these scholars?
Is it possible that the people with the money may have an agenda of their own?
I always try to be civil in my dicussions, thank you.
As for your questions:
Even though doctors and pharmacists are taught in thr same manner, if one noticed issues with the data from a study, they would speak up. Consider this, Doc A pubished a study saying that this new vaccine works and is safe. Doc B then peer reviews it and finds the vaccine causes 1% of people to go blind. Do you think that Doc B would get the vaccine or have his/her kids take it? Doc B has a duty to honestly report the facts. Many frauds have been found through this method and we are better for it. Also, being peer reviewed can take years as many times they have to reproduce the studies to verify the data.
Usually universities. Yes some times pharmaceutical companies do.
Of course it is, but their kids are on the same vaccines. And thier grandkids and so for. There is an easy test to see if a general consperiusy theory holds up, do rich people die from it? Do rich people take the medicines to prevent it? If yes, in general the thoery doesn't hold up. Why would the rich and powerful knowingly harm themselves.
If by speaking out Doc A ends his career, is he really going to speak out?
pharmaceutical companies are known to make generous donations to universities. So, basically these studies are funded by those who stand to profit from results in their favour.
There is a long list of rich people with sick children. Autism particularly. Which didn't exist before vaccines. People drive cars to work every day knowing there is a risk, but their desire for money blinds them from the risk.
A person of ethics, yes i do think they would. Most docs i know did not get into solely for the money, rather they do truely care about people.
Sure they make donations, but do you know they spend millions on research that goes no were. I don't have quite a bleak out look on all corps.
Vaccines do not cause autism. There were many cases of it prior to us using them.
https://www.autismspeaks.org/science/science-news/no-mmr-autism-link-large-study-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-kids
https://www.google.com/amp/s/geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/09/22/autism-increase-mystery-solved-no-its-not-vaccines-gmos-glyphosate-or-organic-foods/amp/
The one study that claimed vaccienes did, was retracted and show to be completely false. By peer reviews. People have a concern for mercury in vaccines, well there is not mercury in them. Thimerosal was a mercury based preservative that was removed due to there being a thought that it might do harm. In this case, the system worked. The flu vaccine is the only one i know of that still uses it. If you don't get a flu shot, so what.