Personally I always say "hydro-fluoro-silicic acid", because that is the actual compound that is being used, and it gets around the cognitive dissonance that folks have from decades of "pro-fluoride" propaganda. It also stumps those who are intelligent, but anti-"conspiracy" (pro-status quo/these are the Richard Dawkins lovers) and always respond with: "but fluoride is just a naturally occurring chemical compound."
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thats a much longer word LOL. I feel like if I wrote my post only calling it that, everyone would be confused! I'm glad you told me about this though.
For titles I'd say fluoride works so people know the topic and click on it, but it's important to call things what they are. The power of statism comes almost completely from calling things other than what they are.
For example:
There is a ton of power in words, and for those of us on the side of truth, it's important that we use truthful language. Maybe something like opening with "how do you feel about fluoride in your water?" followed by "how about hydrofluorosilicic acid, a dangerous neurotoxin and manufacturing waste-product?" (fyi companies face huge fines from the EPA if they allow it to escape into the water or air from their plants, so they turn it into salt form, which is then sold to municipalities to put in the water)
lol