This article is NOT bad but there's a couple of conspicuous issues that should be pointed out

• It lacks citations of studies or scientific papers. A properly researched paper will include at least some links to Pubmed or quotations from the abstracts of researchers.
• It lacks meaningful anecdotes. There should be abundant anecdotal evidence for the benefits described.
• It lacks honest discussion of the downsides of what's being recommended. Everything has a downside.

I'm not an automated bot, I'm a real person who actually looked at this article. I don't point out the shortcomings of this article to troll or be negative, I point these out so that the author can do a better job in the future. It's not easy to research and properly write a high quality, honest article let's be charitable to the author by assuming that they simply didn't know better. Do better @Valyk.

Upvote this comment to encourage more rigorous, high quality content here on Steemit. Thanks!