But seriously, whoever believes this shit has a screw loose. Mentions scientific studies yet doesn't post a single one. Brings up the old CTO of nokia's issues, when it has nothing to do with modern cellular phones and is likely bullshit anyways. Complete retardation along the lines of the anti-vaxxers and flat-earthers.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I linked a long presentation that fully explains a specific study. I also have a long list of other studies I can supply if needed - but if you haven't actually reviewed the one I did provide then there isn't much point. I have long discussed such topics online and I can see and feel a mile away when someone is demonstrating confirmation bias.
The presentation goes to decent lengths to discuss the function of animal tests with regards to cancer and the ethical problems with testing on humans directly. The risks to population are clear unless you deny aspects of reality.
Here's a link with numerous published studies highlighting the risks: https://www.ureka.org/pages/view/15412/the-closer-you-are-to-cell-phone-towers-the-sicker-you-are
Introducing the expert forum, Davis explained how the conference would cover multiple aspects of electromagnetic fields and health from the recent research evidence on carcinogenicity to medical applications to regulations and policy. Dr. Davis made the following points. The outdated adult head models used to evaluate cell phones today were developed in 1996 and do not adequately protect the millions of current users who are children. Recent studies from U.S. government and Italian researchers to be presented at the conference strengthen the body of evidence indicating that electromagnetic fields could cause and/or promote cancer. Peer reviewed research also indicates adverse effects to sperm and reproductive system development. Experimental research indicates adverse effects on neurological development.
? I have no idea what you are talking about here. My entire career is mostly in Software engineering and has nothing at all to do with wifi concerns. Your final claim here is incorrectly written and cannot be reliably parsed using English grammar rules - perhaps you can provide more detail to support your claims, because you appear to be pulling them out of thin air.
Anyone who diligently uses the scientific method understands immediately that when someone's rebuttal to a long list of studies is to label them 'dogshit' and to belittle them without even a shred of counter evidence provided - then that someone in question is outside of integrity and balance. Throwing in casual ad hominem attack is another clue as to the lack of integrity present.
If you can demonstrate why the many studies published are 'not relevant' today then go ahead - but several of them are from 2013 and cellphone towers and phones have not undergone a significant enough transformation in that time for your claim here to be even vaguely true.
When you can respond here with substance we can discuss your claims. However, continued borderline trolling will result in you being muted, not because your position is so amazingly powerfully true, but because you are wasting everyone's time here with unsubstantiated claims that demonstrate ego imbalance that wants to compete instead of simply sharing understandings that can lead to co-creating beneficial outcomes for all involved.
Do you realize you're being a real dick? Steemit isn't the place for it.
There are scientific studies that proves wifi signals which are radiation and cell phones as well as cell phones and towers can cause cancer it was even ruled in California last year that smartphones cause cancer. :)