It does seem to portray some aspects of our own world.

Whenever I see people disinfect their hands at every opportunity and whatnot, I think about how they're weakening their own natural immune response and setting themselves up for a bigger downturn when they (inevitably) do catch something.

Similarly, I don't think we'd actually be helping ourselves to obsess over disease in a collective way like this. There's a blowback to it.

"There is an increasing demand for the support of vaccines regardless of any potential harm that is demonstrated, to even champion forcing people to get vaccinated against their free will choice to not have vaccines injected into them or their children."

Right, that's the part that's so twisted. It's not enough to have their opinion of what the best/healthiest thing is; they actually are saying they want to control what other people choose to do with their bodies.

"When does our free will choice to not have things injected into us get thrown out the window, where centralized authorities get to decide things for us?"

Never, of course. If there truly was a need to be vaccinated (or any other similar issue) you could solve it thru reputation and ostracism.

"If you don't get vaccinated, you can't join this community of people who want everyone to be vaccinated" -- Fair.

And then if it's true that vaccination is a good thing, this norm would win out as it becomes clear that these are the healthiest people.

So there's a way to live amongst only people who are vaccinated, but it requires voluntary choice.

Ironically, the top-down ordering of everyone to be vaccinated will never work anyways. You'll never get absolutely everyone to do it with no one slipping thru the cracks. So as far as having the totally pure society where everyone is vaccinated-- there's actually no way to accomplish it by fiat, whereas you potentially could thru voluntarism (it just becomes a question of whether it's actually true that vaccines are good).