Every MNCs, NGOs, and influential personalities all might seem to given own rating of 100% or at least a passing grade to their missions or objective stated in any causes. But the real fact is none can really be the final answer in the future, always pushing hard and slowly through the political, diplomatic, capitalism channels.Include red tapes and bureaucracy or corruption and we get targets of eliminating poverty and inequality in decades time frame as target with no promise of success. It’s pure dreams and hopes that they had created for us to be pacified or depend on. It is pathetic, not an good deed worthy of publicity that the man Pope Francis(as the man in highest command of the biggest religion group) can only help a dozen Syria refugees out the millions refugees worldwide as the man in control of the biggest religion on earth) and the UN can’t even just ask all its members to take in by proportion of GDP or population to settle this humanitarian crisis.
Accountability and Transparency are also lacking in 99% of the organizations. (google list of top 100 corporation taxpayer in each country and you will find little up to date info). One fact today is top 500 MNCs in forbes, 195+ governments and thousands NGOs (wango.org) worldwide failed us one way or another regardless of what they accomplish or set to do next, if not for scientific constraints.
New advance technology in energy, food, AI, medical, IT is not what we lack now that in the past we can excuse ourselves with. Millions of volunteers had contributed their effort based on passion, interest, and abilities but reap little KPIs that they or NGOs supporting can be really proud of. It’s easy to predict that by the time anyone born today, died in future will have the same climate, poverty, equality, moral or ethics issues still around and uncontrollable. We today should not only depend on one to live his/her life fully and the governments/NGOs decade timeline to solve all current issues. A decade is more than enough to provide equality to all and solve all other related issues with basic income + social business + IT with a global currency.
List of websites/organizations GUS will look forward to collaborate with or had research on their objectives in shaping or modifying the GUS model both have common interest in.
- http://www.globalincome.org explanation and research on global basic income which is similar to what GUS proposed but different in nature.
- BIEN: http://Basicincome.org recently volunteer to BIEN News to learn more of basic income concept and development in the world.
- PSP: http://principledsocietiesproject.org The LEDDA system within is similar to GUS in certain policies setting but differ in which GUS is 100% users owned, free from individual or corporations corruption and decision making structure need modified a bit.
- PSIA: https://collaboration.worldbank.org/groups/poverty-and-social-impact-analysis-online-community
- Human centered business model: https://collaboration.worldbank.org/groups/gfljd/projects/human-centered-business-model-cop
- Digital currency: http://grantcoin.org
- Social collaboration platform: https://ekata.social/; trello; slack: http://guscrop.slack.com (for interested parties to work efficiently across borders)
- concepts of social well being: http://thevenusproject.org/the http://solutionproject.org
- Volunteer management and reward:system: http://www.createthegood.org/ http://aarp.org
- digital currency wallet: https://everex.one/
- Global issues list: http://globalissues.org
- E citizen model: https://www.ecitizen.gov.sg
- world government model: http://worldgovernment.org/
- Supply chain transparency: http://transparency-one.com
- Online account and credit score: https://www.mint.com/
- Potential NGOs directory: www,.wango.org
- Infographic for GUS modelling: https://www.pinterest.com/llsfl/
-dash.org: For its governance model of vote to spend and two tier model-https://www.dashcentral.org/dashvotetracker.com
-daohub.org: investor platform on blockchain
-steemit.com: mechanism to reward point on each click
-the-blockchain.com: news update on blockchain
-www.capterra.com: all business software reveiw. To identify good features and implement for GUS applications using open source.
-https://www.adamsmith.org: The theory of moral sentiment seem a good book from which I can use some quotes in defining GUS policies. - researchgate.net: portal to get scientists validate some of my policies eg: lifetime loan or basic income from birth concept.
Do suggest me in comment section for others that may wish or have potential to partner/collaborate in any area of common interests to make GUS better:)