It's nice, BUT I need to say that I prefer previous version and I hope it will remain.
I'm only small GRC miner with 15 GRC so you can ignore my opinion, but I felt I need to say it
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It's nice, BUT I need to say that I prefer previous version and I hope it will remain.
I'm only small GRC miner with 15 GRC so you can ignore my opinion, but I felt I need to say it
Cheers for the feedback @flodner :)
I do appreciate the intentions of the old logo - it's not a bad piece of artwork! Its issue was that, despite being a nice piece of artwork, it did not perform its job as a logo. I went into depth about these difficulties back in Branding Update #1 if you'd like to have a read :)
Thanks, I will read, just wanted to say in case in future you might return to it, or may be will use it along with new branding