You’re twisting the facts, so allow me to explain what actually happened

I gave my perspective, you gave your perspective, we have differing opinions.

Finally, after the extended period of ignoring the requests, you muster up a downvote a week later.

I was busy, when I became available I downvoted it and proposed an alternative tweet with the majority of the original tweet's contents. You disregarded my change proposal and doubled down on harassment tactically in the middle of the night.

There were no rules against downvoting content late, yet this is what you got stuck on instead of acknowledging the proposed tweet changes.

Notably, you were the only person in the channel at the time who had posting abilties who would actually use them.

Quez had equal full control. You made the active decision to not engage him despite him being a valid path to posting content.

This exact scenario is in fact the perfect example of why we needed more people with posting abilities

So vote for the new Twitter volunteers or encourage neutral participants to volunteer.

How are the posting capabilities of other platforms like Instagram/Facebook distributed? Solely in individuals control? Why aren't these platforms micromanaged like Twitter?

Tagging you in a post and reminding you that something needs to be Tweeted because it met the voting threshold doesn’t count.

I repeatedly told you that for me it was the middle of the night, you persisted with aggressive arguments over bad quality tweets (disregarding my proposed changes), you showed little to no empathy for my situation & this made for an unappealing hostile work environment from my perspective.

To whom, and in what format? Is this asking for permission to be vocal about one’s opinions or is it asking for free reign to post whatever content they want? Well, nobody can really tell, because there is no usable discussion URL provided where we could talk about it.

All valid points/questions, I didn't create the poll so I don't have those answers, I did find it funny that it passed though, thanks for the support 👍

I’ve already stated my opinions about why I think the original system that you derailed has been superior. I’m not going to volunteer for a system which I don’t think is ideal.

The original system is dead, volunteer or live with interacting with the new volunteers for pushing Twitter content through the twitter account. Alternatively, make your own Twitter account.

You seem to be taking offense to how we tagged you as a reminder to Tweet the proposed content that met our voting threshold, even though you were the only one who was capable of Tweeting. Kind of an unproductive attitude, wouldn’t you think?

I wasn't the only one capable of tweeting, at the time there were 2-3 with such capabilities. I did take offense to the passive aggressive behavioral micromanaging and the middle of the night arguments which I informed you of at the time of occurrence. It was an unproductive work environment, you're right - good thing we're moving onto new solutions.