Google is up to something Changes answer to world debt within 24 hours

in #google7 years ago (edited)

Today a google search for world debt presents this vague answer

29uyl8p-1.jpg
Screen Shot 2018-01-08 at 8.51.36 PM.png
THE NEXT BIGGEST@&%? compared to what?*

Less than 24 hours ago this was the answer it provided.Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 6.53.20 PM-2.png

What changed?

To be fairly pretentious, I did write this post where I criticized their priorities and now I am rethinking if it is morally acceptable to be paid to spread my thoughts, I do need the money but I do not want to be a part of helping Alphabet learn more about how we think. They have made countless programs to determine the opinions and classify of all of their customers, but they know they are in an echo-chamber because their data isn't backed up by real world statistics.

Are our opinions being monitored here?

Obviously there is a genuine community building here of people that have long been disconnected from the internet out of poverty. I wouldn't discount the informational value of the unique people that blog on here as being worth much more than they are paid. I will tread lighter on steemit from now on unless absolutely necessary. Unfortunately I am questioning the overall good that will come of this site and there is obviously no incentive for me to blog my genuine opinions here any longer no amount of money is worth helping these parasites that have taken the world from us.

Why would they do this/Whats on their minds?


se·ques·tra·tion
ˌsikwəˈstrāSH(ə)n,ˌsekwəˈstrāSH(ə)n/Submit
noun
the action of taking legal possession of assets until a debt has been paid or other claims have been met.


They will try.

Sort:  

Also, before anyone gets up in arms about this, let's do our due diligence. Simply Googling "world debt" brought up the same article as you've posted images of here. !

Site Screenshot from 1.9.2017, 0228 EST

If you just click the article, scroll up to above the text that you've pictured here, it says that,

"According to the IIF, $68 trillion, the largest chunk, belongs to non-financial companies."

Now, I'm not even attempting to claim that this is a reasonable statement. Nor am I claiming to know anything about economics. I am, however, saying that there is a completely reasonable, non-"doom and gloom" analysis of what happened with Google showing you these results.

Here is the article for those interested in becoming a little saddened, disheartened, or confused about what this even means

I was wondering if perhaps these results were determined and differentiated by the previous searches, obviously they are two different sections of the same video but after searching sequestration I got the second result the same one which you are receiving. Now I am getting only this one,

Global debt hit an all-time high of $233 trillion (£169 trillion) in the third quarter of 2017, according to the Institute of International Finance (IIF). That's a $16 trillion increase on debt levels at the end of 2016 and more than three times the size of the global economy.4 days ago

This selection is more of a statement of the facts than implying the debt as collectively belonging to the world at large.

The video where this text is coming from is very misleading propaganda, and not factual.

If you would prefer not to share your opinions in a broadcasted sense on Steemit, would you be willing to have a conversation over the phone in an manner in which no currently known system could track the contents of?

I'd love to hear more of your thoughts, but wouldn't want to make you uncomfortable or appears as if I'm not heeding your concerns by asking you to post more.

Here are some options that at least claim e2e encryption. I think they'd be at least worth exploring.

I will keep sharing and I am always happy to answer philosophical questions ;)

My opinions are my opinions and that is all, I post them here hoping for other people to critique them so that I may see new perspectives.

Ask whatever you want here but I prefer to write or have discussions in person. I don't have the need for encryption services, thanks though.

What kind of topics are you interested in seeing me write about?

And.... Now it's back to what it was yesterday, must just be a response test. glad I caught it though, what they are implying with this rhetoric is almost beyond comprehension.

I think both search results are off the mark. As for your question about the morality of getting paid for your opinion; just remember that newspapers and google have their content manipulated by advertising revenue, besides, maybe you are just getting paid for bringing us an interesting point for discussion...we don't have to upvote. Greetings!

Very true and thanks for your thoughts @onnovocks I value the discussion of these topics but I feel like I need to get back to just posting art and fiction here because I am influenced by the rewards I have gotten from others here and so far the biggest rewards have been for name dropping you tube channels, posting advertising, and other boring things. I put too much hope in this site and feel letdown. I need to readjust my priorities for using the internet, make some new art and spend time thinking.

I have been observing what I think is a high degree of manipulation that does not live up to the letter D. I also see that some are using a strategy to deal with this, which is to be expected.

Where does the answer summary come from?
The summary is a snippet extracted programmatically from what a >visitor sees on your web page. What's different with a featured snippet is >that it is enhanced to draw user attention on the results page. When we >recognize that a query asks a question, we programmatically detect >pages that answer the user's question, and display a top result as a >featured snippet in the search results.

Like all search results, featured snippets reflect the views or opinion of >the site from which we extract the snippet, not that of Google. We are >always working to improve our ability to detect the most useful snippet, >so the results you see may change over time. You can provide feedback >on any Featured Snippet by clicking the "Give Feedback" link at the >bottom of the box.

Opting out of featured snippets
You can opt out of featured snippets by preventing snippets on your >page using the < m e t a name="googlebot" content="nosnippet"> tag on >your page. This will remove all snippets on your page, including those in >regular search results.

How can I mark my page as a featured snippet?
You can't. Google programmatically determines that a page contains a >likely answer to the user's question, and displays the result as a featured >snippet.

Google programmatically determines that a page contains a >likely answer to the user's question, and displays the result as a featured >snippet.

They disclose that they use their programming to find pages and not which part of the page, this means every page on the internet is processed for "useful information"

This is what they call artificial intelligence but there is actually no such thing and never will be. AI is just more complicated functions and programs that are still controlled by its writer.

Who gets to determine what is useful, I think we all know how things deliberately left out, can change the message entirely. A half truth is still a whole lie. I agree that AI can also be manipulated in several ways; either through programming, but also by manipulating the information it gets to process. Greetings!

Knowing little about finances, I DO know how the "Fractional lending system" works...
So my question is: TO WHOM DOES THE WORLD OWE THE MONEY???
I think I have an idea...
🙂

Maybe the Rothschild family could have an answer to this question.

I bet fearful people are emotionally responding to this. Debt is an Illusion, the banks plan to make debt sky rocket then act like super heroes saving the day when they zero out all that debt.

Oldest trick in the book, buy the public debt and then slam the value into the ground to rebuy it.

you also have to take in consideration the dns google.com doesn't give the same results that .it .es .fr .co.uk for instance I have About 13,000,000 results when you have 339 millions using 'world debt'. We are also forced to use the dns of the country where we are.

Reliable information shouldn't be given by a search engine, but by researched back-uped shared articles anyway, fuck google results

This post has received a 2.26 % upvote from @drotto thanks to: @godo.

This post was upvoted and resteemed by @resteemr!
Thank you for using @resteemr.


@resteemr is a low price resteem service.
Check what @resteemr can do for you. Introduction of resteemr.

Thank you for using F-RESTEEM service and supporting @fresteem.
Your post is resteemed and upvoted for your 0.001 sbd or steem.
dsividers-2450827_640.png
Low price resteem service : F-RESTEEM. Come again and support me.