Ok, how about not producing content that finds favor with the circle jerkers?
You know, like going on strike?
Instead of producing what we can agree is often 'good' content and creating value for the circle jerk, instead you produce shitposts guaranteed to bring whale derision?
Instead of playing their game and being rewarded for being a good little boy, how about you organize the folks that will rebuild from the ashes when the reward pool rapists move on to rape something else.
Everytime you produce 'good' content you are extending their time to play out their scams.
You decrease the pressure on them to change things.
Why would they change when they still have content creators playing along?
As for solutions, ive been clear about what i think fixes it.
So you solution to shit posts is for everyone to create shit posts and nobody create good content? So sabotage the system?
Isnt that akin to burning your house down to get even with the bank?
So let me ask you, if everyone created shit content, what happens when DTube and other apps jump ship? How are you going to bring something from the ashes when you have EOS coming online and possibly losing apps on STEEM to there? What kind of message does that spread to all the developers who are creating stuff on here now? Do you want them to take their creations elsewhere?
Sorry to disagree but I think that is a quick way to becoming Myspace. 1M accounts is a significant amount but really just a rounding error in the online world at this point. You do not get ahead by taking a brand and drilling it into the ground.
As for you comment about the little guy, I can see you care none for that person. Do you really think destroying this would affect most of the whales? Do you think what they have in STEEM is all they have? The reason why the investors were able to drop hundreds of thousands of dollars into this project is because they had it....they werent poor people.
Of course, you approach take the people who are making a living off of STEEM, those in third world nations or having STEEM as a second income in their homes and cuts them off.
We got shit posts on all the trending pages as it is.
Things are this way because the folks with the keys to the code want them this way.
We've already wasted over a year doing what those controllers want, scamming and raping the reward pool to benefit the whales.
They are unlikely to change anything until it becomes unprofitable.
The fastest way over that wall is to collapse it, and start over.
I can see why you would be against that.
Can you see why i favor it?
We are gonna lose to eos regardless because @dan is aware that a growing userbase comes from cultivating diversity, not raping it, but stinc has refused to recognize that despite a year long experiment proving what was known before the hardfork.
Bring back the n(something), slap a 100mv voting limit on it, and wait for the userbase to grow.
Instead we carry on duping the newbs and raping bigger fools like that is going to continue to work in the long term?
The large investors are just gonna have to suck it up for a year.
If steem was made attractive to the little guys steem would stand a chance of mass adoption.
Until then, it will stumble along as a scam coin that only fools buy into.
I dont know what it will take to change where this ship is going but im starting to hope for icebergs.
As for those little guys eating from steem today, do you even have a clue how much vote bots and delegation suck from the value of the minnow votes they are getting?
Its safe to say that the little votes that they do get would increase four fold.
Instead of dimes, they would get 40¢.
Check the math, i dont want you to take my word for it.
When the hard fork allowed all that idle sp to come into the vote pool it screwed every single little account out of any chance of getting rewarded.