You're a bit harsh when you talk about Rome 2 Total War.Yes it was broken when it was released but after it was patched it became a far better game than the original.One of the best games in the whole series.And Warhammer is a great game too but only after it was patched.Just my opinion.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I am not arguing with you opinion, both those games have their merits. I believe that even after Rome 2 was patched and all DLC released, the game just felt so unbalanced. The only time I really enjoyed it was after modding.
I recently played a coop campaign with a friend (2 months ago?) and we were in a battle that I wish I recorded to show you. We shattered the enemy army except for 2 pike battalions. We surrounded them and should have torn them apart, but even my flanking units were being slaughtered. We were playing on the hardest difficulty, but I do not see how difficulty has anything to do with unit stats on the battlefield.
Warhammer was a disappointment for me because of many reasons. I mentioned it in some other comments above. But to clarify, it was not the fantasy aspect that I hated. I was really looking forward to it. I hated that the game was incomplete!
I forgot to mention. The removal of family trees and how they attempted to do the politics was not a good move. Luckily Atilla learned from that.