Is the new game worth it for 2 years?

Ubisoft, which is one of the most AAA game producers of our time, has tried to put contents that will excite the players from the other side while squeezing water from one side of Assassin's Creed brand over the years. Assassin's Creed games, which are trapped between money-hungry investors and developers who want to produce something new, are excited at times, but sometimes we have come up against them with interesting themes. When the dates were shown on November 13, 2007, the players who saw Altair, who was disappeared with the swing of the church bell and assassinated for fraternity, did not stop at Assassin's Creed. Ubisoft, who recently packed up the box thanks to the Prince of Persia brand, now wants to add something new to the video game world. But probably they could not imagine that Assassin's Creed would be ahead of Ubisoft. After Assassin's Creed's success in excess of millions, thought to be merely a trilogy, as it was in the same Prince of Persia, the series unfortunately fell to the hands of investors driving their palms together. So although Ubisoft says that the podium is a 2-year pause, we have a game that is about four years old in development. Assassin's Creed: Ubisoft, who said he would try something new after the Syndicate game, decided to go back to Origins. But is it like the story of a hero born of his return ashes? Or was it a game that we did not expect? I would like to point out that Assassin's Creed: Origins, which is a big excitement for players with E3 2017 and Gamescom 2017, can not do the same thing until the last minute. Among all the games that came out in 2017, the question "Did not there also a new Assassin's Creed?" Questioned between us all as a team.