A great contribution to the great contribution to the

A great contribution to the great contribution to the history of science, such an approach is called cumulative up to the cumulative series of the history of science according to which knowledge throughout the history of science will accumulate and strictly speaking there are no breaks there are no breaks there are no catastrophic or dramatic events in the history of science; how grateful students take the baton to the cowards by saying already tired teachers Yes and I go further Yes but if we look You again on the history of science we will see a lot of examples of what is ochen часто often the stories that dominated were insanely and at some time and a certain point and not just somehow with gratitude I accept with successive but discarded are declared unnecessary harmful stupid empty and discarded and, as a matter of fact, if we look in science we will see a huge amount of these here are the scientific corpses of theoretical corpses Yes, we will see something in the history of science rounded up the number of categories before being discarded as useless and that's where it comes to fit. Here's this gorgeous picture of the baton in front of cha from generation to generation to the accumulation of scientific knowledge and the real history of science that shows us sometimes very Bloodthirsty such a warlike probably a crossword with such a question and you are not the only ones Yes rejoiced at the beginning of the 20th century Karl popper who was nentori inside the picture cumulative up to which the positivists drew adhere to everything Something